Opinion

Opinion: Candidates choose not to respond to questions

Dick Rylander discusses candidates’ reluctance to respond to public questions in the current election cycle.

By Dick Rylander · October 9, 2024
Opinion: Candidates choose not to respond to questions
Dick Rylander discusses candidates’ reluctance to respond to public questions in the current election cycle.


Clark County resident Dick Rylander addresses candidates’ unwillingness to reveal positions with voters

Dick Rylander
Dick Rylander

Dick Rylander 
for Clark County Today

I have been a resident of Clark County for a total of 32-plus years. I’ve been a candidate for several offices so I understand the challenges candidates face. They want to appeal to everyone and irritate as few as possible.

In early September I reached out to residents of Clark County and asked what they (as a voter) would like to know about positions of candidates they could vote for. From that feedback I consolidated the suggestions and set up a simple Yes/No position format with room for some notes. Those questions can be seen below:

I sent an email to each of the candidates for Washington House and Senate seats in the 17th; 18th; 20th and 49th Legislative District’s on Sept. 23 using the contact email on their website(s). I asked them to respond no later than Oct. 4 explaining that responses would be shared with the public.

I received an email from one candidate asking for some clarifications.

As of Oct. 5 I received exactly ZERO (0) responses.

Why no responses? Given the level of vitriol in the political world today the candidates may be concerned about how their comments could be turned into negative attack ads. They may find some issues to be multifaceted and not easy to address simply. They might not want to be pigeon holed because of an answer. They may be concerned that the downside is greater than the upside if they respond.

A few years ago I spent several hours over coffee talking with a candidate for one of the House seats in Southwest Washington. I asked them why they avoided certain topics or were vague on others. This candidate said the consultants suggested that being vague reduced negatives and increased the chance of getting elected.

Maybe it’s best if people don’t have a lot of clarity about a candidate? I’m sure there are other reasons why none of them chose to respond.

In the end you can read what you can find AND you can contact each candidate and ask one of these questions or your own. When you learn something please share with others so we can all be better informed.

Related Coverage

Opinion: Democrats make housing less affordable in Clark County
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: Democrats make housing less affordable in Clark County

September 24, 2026
Opinion: A Boeing strike could give the state’s UI fund a much bigger test
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: A Boeing strike could give the state’s UI fund a much bigger test

September 23, 2026
Opinion: A judge who won’t pick sides
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: A judge who won’t pick sides

September 22, 2026
Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension

September 18, 2026

Comments

Loading comments…