Mark Harmsworth believes that until the definition of ‘reasonably expects’ is clarified, House Bill 1402 should not be passed
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
House Bill 1402 (HB 1402), introduced by Representative Scott (D), would prohibit an employer from requiring a driver license unless the employer reasonably expects driving to be an essential part of the job function and alternate, cost and travel time equivalent methods of performing a job function are not available.
In principle HB 1402 is not a bad policy and could open up more opportunities for job applicants. However, the language of the bill is ambiguous, particularly the definition of ‘reasonably expects’. This is the term used to define if the license requirement is valid. Failure to comply opens up employers to potential litigation. An employer may inadvertently or unintentionally include a driver’s license requirement for a job, particularly in retail or hospitality jobs. HB 1402 currently will create more problems than it solves.
The bill would put into law;
It is an unfair practice under the Washington Law Against Discrimination for an employer to include a statement in a job advertisement, posting, application, or other material that an applicant must have a valid driver’s license, unless:
- the employer reasonably expects driving to be an essential job function;
- and the employer reasonably believes it would not be comparable in travel time or cost to use an alternative form of transportation, including a ride hailing service, using a taxi, carpooling, bicycling, walking, or transit.
The definition of ‘reasonably expects’ needs a much clearer definition, with no ambiguity, so business owners can advertise jobs to attract the widest set of qualified applicants without fear of litigation.
Until the definition of ‘reasonably expects’ is clarified, House Bill 1402 should not be passed.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
- Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
Ryan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction. - Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?
Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.” - POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?
Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association. - Opinion: Impaired walking vs. impaired driving; pick neither
Doug Dahl argues impaired driving remains deadlier than walking impaired when measured by exposure time, not miles traveled. - Opinion: When the same money helps fund the program and the story
Peter Bracchi examines how the Ed and Dollie Lynch Fund supports Vancouver’s HART program, the Bridge Shelter, and Community Funded Journalism covering the same policy arena.
