Area resident Anna Miller addresses the latest absurdities surrounding the Clark County Council
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
A resolution on Immigration and Customs Enforcement, issued by the Clark County Council? Are we being punked?
One wonders how many more creative ways the Council can invent to spend time, staff resources, and taxpayer dollars on matters that fall entirely outside its authority, while simultaneously stoking public frustration and division.
Except for adopting the Sheriff’s budget, the County Council has no jurisdiction whatsoever over law enforcement operations. The Sheriff is an independently elected official, solely responsible for daytoday law enforcement decisions. This is not a gray area, nor is it controversial — it is basic county governance.
For anyone who may have lost the plot, here is the actual business of the people that should occupy the Council’s time:
• Land use and development policy, including the Comprehensive Plan
• Allocation of tax revenue and adoption of budgets for county offices
• Zoning and development codes
• Countywide land use policy changes (not individual projects or negotiations with developers)
• Creation and funding of the County Road Fund
• Adoption of longrange transportation plans
• Participation in assigned committees, advisory boards, and intergovernmental bodies
Notably absent from this list: symbolic resolutions about federal law enforcement agencies over which the Council has exactly zero authority.
It is refreshing, at least, when members of the Council like Councilor Belkot and in this matter Councilor Little, demonstrate a clear understanding of their role and the limits of their power. That level of clarity should not be exceptional — it should be the minimum requirement.
Perhaps it’s time for the Council, collectively, to stay in its lane and return to the unglamorous but essential work it was elected to do.
PS: Note to Chair Marshall: If a resolution’s legacy is that it was wiped with and thrown on the floor, as reported, one might reasonably question why it was introduced at all.
Anna Miller
Clark County resident and taxpayer
- Camas School District Legislative Advocacy Committee to host Candidate Forum
Six candidates from two federal and state districts will answer education questions at Discovery High School on Oct. 5. - Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
Ryan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction. - Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?
Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.” - POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?
Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association. - WA high court tosses natural gas measure approved by voters
The WA Supreme Court struck down I-2066 in a 6-3 ruling, finding it covered four distinct subjects in violation of the single-subject rule.
