Seven of Washington’s 10 U.S. House members supported the resolution honoring ‘the life, leadership, and legacy of Charlie Kirk’
Shauneen Miranda
Washington State Standard
WASHINGTON — The U.S. House passed a resolution Friday honoring conservative activist Charlie Kirk and condemning his assassination.
The five-page resolution — agreed to 310-58 — lauds Kirk as a “courageous American patriot” whose “commitment to civil discussion and debate stood as a model for young Americans across the political spectrum.”
The resolution divided the lower chamber, as Democratic lawmakers have condemned the assassination of Kirk and violence in politics but have blasted beliefs he voiced.
All 58 votes against the resolution came from Democrats. Ninety-five Democrats voted in favor of the resolution, 38 voted “present” and 22 did not vote.
All 215 Republican votes were in support of the resolution. Four GOP members did not vote.
Tensions emerged in Congress in the days since Kirk was fatally shot Sept. 10 while speaking on a Utah college campus. The resolution also came as President Donald Trump and his administration have sought to crack down on rhetoric surrounding Kirk’s death. Trump, Vice President JD Vance and members of the Cabinet plan to attend a memorial service for Kirk on Sunday in Arizona.
“We passed a resolution to honor the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk, my late friend, the friend of so many in this chamber, and we called out political violence in America,” House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters in the U.S. Capitol following the vote.
The Louisiana Republican recited the last line of the resolution, which says the House “calls upon all Americans … to reject political violence, recommit to respectful debate, uphold American values, and respect one another as fellow Americans.”
“Sadly, a number of Democrats could not bring themselves to vote for that,” Johnson said. “We have to let everybody make their own judgments about that.”
In a Friday statement, Congressional Black Caucus Chair Yvette Clarke and members of the group said “violence has no place in our politics,” including the killing of Kirk.
“At the same time, we must condemn violence without abandoning our right to speak out against ideas that are inconsistent with our values as Americans,” the New York Democrat and caucus members said, adding that they “strongly disagree with many of the beliefs Charlie Kirk promoted.”
They also described the House resolution as “an attempt to legitimize Kirk’s worldview — a worldview that includes ideas many Americans find racist, harmful, and fundamentally un-American.”
Friday’s passage came a day after the Senate passed a resolution — introduced by Florida GOP Sen. Rick Scott — that designates Oct. 14, 2025, as a “National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk.” There was no roll call vote taken.
Oct. 14 marks Kirk’s birthday.
How WA House members voted
Seven of Washington’s 10 U.S. House members supported the resolution honoring “the life, leadership, and legacy of Charlie Kirk.”
Republican Reps. Dan Newhouse and Michael Baumgartner and Democrat Reps. Suzan DelBene, Rick Larsen, Adam Smith, Kim Schrier, and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez voted for the measure.
“Peaceful debate drives our political system, and Charlie Kirk embodied that sentiment,” Newhouse said in a statement. “This bipartisan resolution sends a clear message that politically motivated violence has no place in our society.”
Democratic Reps. Pramila Jayapal, Emily Randall and Marilyn Strickland voted against it.
“Every one of us should clearly and constantly condemn his assassination and any political violence when it happens,” Jayapal said in a statement. “But voting for this resolution puts words in my mouth that I endorse Charlie Kirk’s views, when I wholly and fundamentally in my bones am in strong opposition to most of his views.”
Read the resolution here.
Ariana Figueroa contributed to this report. This report was first published by the Washington State Standard.
- Camas School District Legislative Advocacy Committee to host Candidate Forum
Six candidates from two federal and state districts will answer education questions at Discovery High School on Oct. 5. - Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
Ryan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction. - Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?
Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.” - POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?
Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association. - WA high court tosses natural gas measure approved by voters
The WA Supreme Court struck down I-2066 in a 6-3 ruling, finding it covered four distinct subjects in violation of the single-subject rule.
