
Debate over proposed Rules of Procedure changes raises questions about independence, accountability, and representation on regional boards
The Clark County Council is considering new language in its Rules of Procedure that would require councilors serving on boards and commissions to vote in line with the council’s official position. The discussion follows last year’s removal of Councilor Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN board after she said she would vote independently on light rail-related costs. Supporters of the proposed changes say they would clarify authority and ensure a unified voice, while critics argue they would undermine independent judgment and voter representation. This poll asks readers where they stand on that question.
More info:
County Council still looking to change language in Rules of Procedure
- Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pensionRyan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction.
- Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.”
- POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association.
- Opinion: Impaired walking vs. impaired driving; pick neitherDoug Dahl argues impaired driving remains deadlier than walking impaired when measured by exposure time, not miles traveled.
- Opinion: When the same money helps fund the program and the storyPeter Bracchi examines how the Ed and Dollie Lynch Fund supports Vancouver’s HART program, the Bridge Shelter, and Community Funded Journalism covering the same policy arena.










