Opinion

Opinion: Record capital gains revenue won't solve Washington's budget woes

Ryan Frost says a record-smashing capital gains haul that covers less than 10% of the problem is not proof that the rich paying their ‘fair share’ will bring us out of persistent budget deficits

By · June 25, 2026
Listen to this story
WA's Capital Gains Record Won't Fix a Spending Problem
0:000:00
Opinion: Record capital gains revenue won't solve Washington's budget woes

The Seattle Times ran a column earlier this week marveling that Washington's capital gains tax smashed a revenue record even as the wealthy are said to be leaving. Preliminary returns for fiscal 2026 came in at roughly $1.5 billion, about $750 million above the February forecast and far above the $584 million collected the year before. The piece mostly reads as a rebuttal to anyone skeptical of taxing the rich due to fears of wealth flight.

Set aside who is staying and who is leaving. The revenue showed up, and that is worth saying plainly. The impact of the barrage of recent tax increases is likely to be felt over time, not all in the first few years. It is clear that businesses and wealthy people are leaving, but it takes time for the impact of that to be felt. But revenue was never the problem in Olympia, and this is one more data point confirming it.

The column ends with the much more important question for the future of our state: will state government use this money well? On that score, the record is not encouraging. That surprise $750 million in collections is likely to close less than 10% of the roughly $7-$10 billion shortfall the state is projected to face.

If a windfall this large barely makes a dent in our budget deficit, the gap was never created by weak revenue. Total state tax collections have more than doubled over the past decade, the capital gains tax is now outperforming forecasts by nearly 100%, and the budget remains in structural deficit.

When I analyzed the income tax earlier this year, the problem was never whether it would raise money. The problem was that, under Washington's historical spending trajectory, the new revenue would be consumed by dinner, while lawmakers kept spending on dessert, tea, and a midnight snack.

So, credit the column for asking whether Olympia will spend wisely. The unfortunate truth is that we already know the answer. A record-smashing capital gains haul that covers less than 10% of the problem is not proof that the rich paying their “fair share” will bring us out of persistent budget deficits. It is proof that Washington has a spending problem, and historical tax increases and revenue collections will not fix the state budget unless lawmakers begin to reckon with that fact.

Ryan Frost is the director of the Center for Budget and Tax Policy at the Washington Policy Center.

Related Coverage

Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension

September 18, 2026
Opinion: The Seattle Times editorial board makes excuses for the budget failures it condemns
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: The Seattle Times editorial board makes excuses for the budget failures it condemns

September 8, 2026
Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?

September 18, 2026
Opinion: Six charts that explain Washington’s budget problem
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: Six charts that explain Washington’s budget problem

September 1, 2026

Comments

Loading comments…