Lars Larson says ‘Democrats in Olympia work overtime finding new ways to drive sensible people OUT of the state’
Lars Larson
The Northwest Nonsense
Marriage means a lot to many of us, especially Christians and conservatives.
It forms the bedrock for children and families and life.
For liberal Democrats, not so much.
For them, apparently, marriage just offers a tool for politics and money.
How else do you explain why Democrats in Olympia just passed a massive new income tax with a gigantic penalty on married couples?
It’s not bad enough that the unnecessary tax supplies cash for a state government addicted to spending beyond OUR means.
Now, state lawmakers from the slavery party have included a penalty for being married.
You see, the new tax applies only to millionaires.
If you make less than a million, you don’t pay.
If two workers each earn $750K paychecks, they’re exempt.
But if they’re married, their household income totals $500K over the limit so they’d pay a $50K marriage penalty
Democrats in Olympia work overtime finding new ways to drive sensible people OUT of the state.
- Camas School District Legislative Advocacy Committee to host Candidate Forum
Six candidates from two federal and state districts will answer education questions at Discovery High School on Oct. 5. - Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
Ryan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction. - Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?
Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.” - POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?
Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association. - WA high court tosses natural gas measure approved by voters
The WA Supreme Court struck down I-2066 in a 6-3 ruling, finding it covered four distinct subjects in violation of the single-subject rule.
