Opinion

Opinion: The beginning of the end of anchor babies

Lars Larson argues the Constitution excludes children born to non-legal residents, as the Supreme Court debates birthright citizenship and public opinion data shows limited support.

By · April 1, 2026
Opinion: The beginning of the end of anchor babies
Lars Larson argues the Constitution excludes children born to non-legal residents, as the Supreme Court debates birthright citizenship and public opinion data shows limited support.
Lars Larson argues the Constitution excludes children born to non-legal residents, as the Supreme Court debates birthright citizenship and public opinion data shows limited support.
Lars Larson argues the Constitution excludes children born to non-legal residents, as the Supreme Court debates birthright citizenship and public opinion data shows limited support.

“The language in America’s Constitution makes it clear: If your mom’s not here legally, you ain’t a citizen.’’ – Lars Larson

Lars Larson
The Northwest Nonsense

I have waited three decades for the end of the ridiculous “birthright citizenship” scam in America.

President Trump banned the unwarranted gift on his first day in office last year by signing an executive order.

Lars Larson

Just because you sneaked into my country and gave birth does grant your baby anchor status in the United States.

Today, for the first time in history, the president sits in the gallery of the U.S. Supreme Court to listen to the oral arguments for what promises to be an historic decision.

Only a couple of dozen countries on earth still grant “birthright citizenship” and most are places you wouldn’t want to live in anyway like Nicaragua, Honduras and Guatemala.

The language in America’s Constitution makes it clear: If your mom’s not here legally, you ain’t a citizen.

Ask Americans what THEY think, as pollsters did last year, and only 31 percent favor this gift to illegal aliens.

The only other supreme court decision on this subject, 128 years ago, decided you ONLY get citizenship with parents who are legally present.

I’m confident this court will decide the same in a few months … and, predictably, liberals will lose their minds.  

So, what else is new?


Related Coverage

Opinion: Democrats make housing less affordable in Clark County
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: Democrats make housing less affordable in Clark County

September 24, 2026
Opinion: A Boeing strike could give the state’s UI fund a much bigger test
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: A Boeing strike could give the state’s UI fund a much bigger test

September 23, 2026
Opinion: A judge who won’t pick sides
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: A judge who won’t pick sides

September 22, 2026
Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
More Politics coverageOpinion

Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension

September 18, 2026

Comments

Loading comments…