Amy Harris, of Clark County Matters, believes that as long as public camping remains a choice, many individuals will continue to refuse shelter and services
Amy Harris
Clark County Matters
Earlier this year, Clark County Matters sent a letter to city officials outlining seven specific recommendations for placing stronger limits on public camping in Vancouver. One of those — banning camping within 1,000 feet of schools, churches, and community centers — should have been enacted years ago. Another simply brings city policy in line with Clark County’s existing restrictions. You can read our full letter here.
We strongly support more shelters and services — those are essential to ending unsheltered homelessness. But as long as public camping remains a choice, many individuals will continue to refuse shelter and services. For some battling mental illness, the decision may be beyond their capacity. For others caught in addiction, it’s a cycle of dependency and criminal activity that requires intervention.
A few days later, the City Attorney responded. It’s telling how far the city will go to rationalize public camping. Despite clear rulings from both the U.S. Supreme Court and Washington state courts upholding the legality of camping bans, Vancouver continues to hide behind legal theories to justify inaction. You can read the City Attorney’s response here.
Rather than taking real steps to limit public camping, the mayor and city council continue to defend it. Vancouver needs leadership willing to pair compassion with accountability. That means ending the dangerous, inhumane encampments harming both vulnerable people and entire neighborhoods. You can read our latest response here.
Let’s be honest: this legal back-and-forth does nothing to get people off the streets — or to protect the families and businesses suffering the consequences of public camping.
Vancouver doesn’t have to become the next Portland. But that depends on whether our leaders act.
Thank you for staying engaged. Your voice matters — and it’s making a difference.
- Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
Ryan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction. - Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?
Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.” - POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?
Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association. - Opinion: Impaired walking vs. impaired driving; pick neither
Doug Dahl argues impaired driving remains deadlier than walking impaired when measured by exposure time, not miles traveled. - Opinion: When the same money helps fund the program and the story
Peter Bracchi examines how the Ed and Dollie Lynch Fund supports Vancouver’s HART program, the Bridge Shelter, and Community Funded Journalism covering the same policy arena.