Camas resident Anna Miller reflects on the actions of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
If Governor Walz of Minnesota calls out the National Guard to interfere with Federal Law Enforcement, he should be arrested for an illegal act.
A governor cannot lawfully deploy a state National Guard to resist or interfere with federal law enforcement. The Constitution, federal supremacy, and multiple court rulings make such resistance illegal, and any attempt would be blocked by federal courts or overridden by presidential authority. Recent cases involving National Guard disputes reinforce this principle clearly.

The U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause makes federal law superior to state law. States cannot obstruct or resist federal officers executing federal law.
If a governor attempted to deploy the Guard to resist federal agents, the President could and should immediately federalize the Guard. This instantly strips the governor of command authority. Guard members must obey federal orders. Federal courts would issue injunctions.
Following an unlawful state order to obstruct federal law enforcement could expose them to federal criminal liability. The governor could face civil or criminal consequences. Obstructing federal officers is a federal crime.
The bottom line is that a governor has zero lawful authority to deploy the National Guard to resist federal law enforcement. Any attempt would be unconstitutional, overridden by presidential authority, and struck down by federal courts.
Walz’s tough talk is a blatant attempt to deflect his complicity in the massive fraud in his state. His ignorance astounds me.
Anna Miller
Camas resident
- Camas School District Legislative Advocacy Committee to host Candidate ForumSix candidates from two federal and state districts will answer education questions at Discovery High School on Oct. 5.
- Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pensionRyan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction.
- Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.”
- POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association.
- WA high court tosses natural gas measure approved by votersThe WA Supreme Court struck down I-2066 in a 6-3 ruling, finding it covered four distinct subjects in violation of the single-subject rule.











