Camas resident Anna Miller says ‘it’s tiresome watching people spout opinions without understanding the basic mechanics of our government’
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
In a recent USA Today article, a woman named Samantha blamed Republicans for the government shutdown, citing their control of the House, Senate, and White House. Her remarks weren’t just misinformed; they were emblematic of a troubling trend: opinions backed by zero personal due diligence.
Let’s be clear. Republicans do hold slim majorities in both chambers and the presidency. But in the Senate, most legislation, including funding bills, requires 60 votes to advance. Republicans hold only 53 seats. That means they need at least seven Democratic votes to move forward. Without bipartisan cooperation, even a majority party cannot pass funding bills alone.
Recent votes to end the shutdown have failed with totals like 54–45. Nearly all Republicans (except Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who voted no and Sen. Jim Justice (R-WV) who abstained or was absent) voted in favor, but only a few Democrats (John Fetterman (D-PA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), and Angus King (I-ME), joined the Republicans to open up the government; insufficient to meet the 60-vote threshold.
Democrats say they’ve withheld support to force negotiations over healthcare subsidies. What they don’t mention is that those subsidies extend to undocumented immigrants, legally termed “illegal aliens.” The euphemisms may vary, but the implications don’t.
My instincts are telling me there’s a deeper play at work here. With the midterms looming, Democratic leaders are dialing up the drama, manufacturing outrage while quietly praying for a political Hail Mary. Their strategy? Create as much pain as possible for the American people and then blame Republicans for the government shutdown, hoping voters won’t notice the sleight of hand behind the curtain.
It’s tiresome watching people spout opinions without understanding the basic mechanics of our government. The Senate was designed to require consensus, not just control. The minority party has leverage, and they are using it to misinform the electorate.
USA Today’s decision to print Samantha’s comments without a single fact check is no surprise. It’s hard not to see it as deliberate: a choice to amplify a false narrative rather than clarify the truth.
If we want to hold our leaders accountable, we must first understand the rules they operate under. Media outlets have a responsibility to inform, not inflame. And citizens have a duty to think before they speak. The bottom line? Five Democratic YES votes stand between us and a reopened government.
Anna Miller
Camas
- Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
Ryan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction. - Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?
Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.” - POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?
Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association. - Opinion: Impaired walking vs. impaired driving; pick neither
Doug Dahl argues impaired driving remains deadlier than walking impaired when measured by exposure time, not miles traveled. - Opinion: When the same money helps fund the program and the story
Peter Bracchi examines how the Ed and Dollie Lynch Fund supports Vancouver’s HART program, the Bridge Shelter, and Community Funded Journalism covering the same policy arena.