Camas resident Anna Miller shares the Social Security Administration’s response to the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
My email from: Social Security Administration ssa.gov
“The Social Security Administration (SSA) is celebrating the passage of the One Big, Beautiful Bill, a landmark piece of legislation that delivers long-awaited tax relief to millions of older Americans.

“The bill ensures that nearly 90% of Social Security beneficiaries will no longer pay federal income taxes on their benefits, providing meaningful and immediate relief to seniors who have spent a lifetime contributing to our nation’s economy.’’
“This is a historic step forward for America’s seniors,” said Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano. “For nearly 90 years, Social Security has been a cornerstone of economic security for older Americans. By significantly reducing the tax burden on benefits, this legislation reaffirms President Trump’s promise to protect Social Security and helps ensure that seniors can better enjoy the retirement they’ve earned.”
“The new law includes a provision that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for most beneficiaries, providing relief to individuals and couples. Additionally, it provides an enhanced deduction for taxpayers aged 65 and older, ensuring that retirees can keep more of what they have earned.
“Social Security remains committed to providing timely, accurate information to the public and will continue working closely with federal partners to ensure beneficiaries understand how this legislation may affect them.”
Anna Miller
Camas
- Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pensionRyan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction.
- Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.”
- POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association.
- Opinion: Impaired walking vs. impaired driving; pick neitherDoug Dahl argues impaired driving remains deadlier than walking impaired when measured by exposure time, not miles traveled.
- Opinion: When the same money helps fund the program and the storyPeter Bracchi examines how the Ed and Dollie Lynch Fund supports Vancouver’s HART program, the Bridge Shelter, and Community Funded Journalism covering the same policy arena.







