Anna Miller says USAID is the Titanic of agencies, and she’s OK with it hitting the iceberg!
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and may not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
The recent revelations about USAID’s $550 million contract fraud — enabled by former contracting officer Roderick Watson — are outrageous, but sadly, not surprising. For years, USAID has operated with minimal scrutiny and maximum insulation, creating fertile ground for corruption.
This case, involving lavish bribes, shell companies, and fake invoices, is just one example of what happens when accountability is treated as optional.
While the scheme was formally exposed by the Department of Justice and USAID’s own Office of Inspector General, it’s worth noting that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has targeted USAID as emblematic of bloated bureaucracy and systemic waste and fraud. The fact that it took more than a decade for this fraud to come to light says everything about the culture within the agency.
Public funds are meant to serve real people — not to line the pockets of insiders and their associates. USAID needs a top-to-bottom audit, real independent oversight, and a housecleaning that goes far beyond one prosecution.
USAID is the Titanic of agencies, and I’m ok with it hitting the iceberg!
Anna Miller
Camas
- Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pension
Ryan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction. - Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?
Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.” - POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?
Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association. - Opinion: Impaired walking vs. impaired driving; pick neither
Doug Dahl argues impaired driving remains deadlier than walking impaired when measured by exposure time, not miles traveled. - Opinion: When the same money helps fund the program and the story
Peter Bracchi examines how the Ed and Dollie Lynch Fund supports Vancouver’s HART program, the Bridge Shelter, and Community Funded Journalism covering the same policy arena.