
The commission will review the county’s charter and potentially make recommendations for amendments
VANCOUVER – The Clark County Charter Review Commission will hold two upcoming meetings. The meetings will be held 5-7 p.m. Wednesday, Jan. 14, and Thursday, Jan. 22.
The meetings are open to the public and will be held in a hybrid format. Attend in person in the sixth-floor hearing room in the Public Service Center at 1300 Franklin St. or virtually via Webex using a link on this web page.
The commission will review the county’s charter and potentially make recommendations for amendments. Fifteen commissioners were elected in the November 2025 general election; three commissioners for each of the five County Councilor districts. Commissioner terms began Jan. 1, 2026, and end Dec. 31, 2027.
Any proposed amendments to the county charter must be decided by Clark County voters in a General Election. Clark County voters in November 2014 voted to adopt the home rule form of government.
More information on the commission is on the county website.
Information provided by Clark Co. WA Communications.
- Camas School District Legislative Advocacy Committee to host Candidate ForumSix candidates from two federal and state districts will answer education questions at Discovery High School on Oct. 5.
- Opinion: Why lawmakers are going after your pensionRyan Frost argues lawmakers included public pensions in the income tax law in preparation for lowering the $1 million deduction.
- Opinion: Washington has an income tax – why won’t the media call it one?Cargill argues the media is using supporters’ preferred label “millionaires tax” instead of the legally accurate term “income tax.”
- POLL: How do you think higher impact fees for school districts affect housing affordability in Clark County?Clark County Council raised impact fees for La Center, Hockinson, and Woodland school districts, drawing pushback from the Building Industry Association.
- WA high court tosses natural gas measure approved by votersThe WA Supreme Court struck down I-2066 in a 6-3 ruling, finding it covered four distinct subjects in violation of the single-subject rule.






