Opinion

POLL: Should Voter-Approved School Athletics Initiatives Face Court Challenges?

A lawsuit over Washington's I-638 and a federal Title IX probe in Camas raise questions about the role of courts.

By Clark County Today · November 12, 2026
Share this story
FacebookEmail
Listen to this story
I-638 Lawsuit and Camas Title IX Probe Spark Reader Poll
0:000:00
POLL: Should Voter-Approved School Athletics Initiatives Face Court Challenges?
A lawsuit seeks to overturn I-638, and the U.S. Department of Education has opened a Title IX investigation into the Camas School District.

Washington voters approved I-638, an initiative that prohibits male students from competing in school athletic activities designated for girls. A lawsuit filed by the ACLU of Washington, Legal Voice, and Pacifica Law Group on behalf of the Washington Education Association, TransFamilies, and parents seeks to overturn the measure and block its enforcement. Separately, the U.S. Department of Education has opened a Title IX investigation into the Camas School District over allegations involving a male runner on a girls' cross-country team. Should voter-approved initiatives on school athletics be subject to court challenges?

Our question: Should voter-approved initiatives on school athletics be subject to court challenges?

This poll relates to our earlier coverage: REPORT: Department of Education launches Title IX probe into Camas School District over boys in girls’ sports, alleged harassment.


This week’s reader poll

Should voter-approved initiatives on school athletics be subject to court challenges?

A lawsuit over Washington's I-638 and a federal Title IX probe in Camas raise questions about the role of courts.

0 votes

This is an unscientific poll reflecting the opinions of participating readers, not a representative survey.

Comments

Loading comments…