POLL: Should the invocation be removed from Clark County Council meetings?

This week’s poll question asks: Should the invocation be removed from Clark County Council meetings? Vote now and share your opinion.

Council debates balancing tradition and inclusivity in meeting practices

This week’s poll question asks whether the invocation should remain a part of Clark County Council meetings. Newly elected Councilor Wil Fuentes has sparked a lively discussion by proposing its removal, arguing that it mixes religion with government business. While some view the invocation as a valued tradition, others believe it may not align with modern practices of inclusivity. The council is considering alternatives like land acknowledgments and moments of reflection. What do you think? Vote now and share your opinions to help shape this important discussion.

POLL: Should the invocation be removed from Clark County Council meetings?*
  • Yes, it’s unnecessary for council business 🛑20.86% (87 votes)
  • No, it’s a valued tradition 🏛️75.78% (316 votes)
  • I’m not sure; I need more information 🤔3.36% (14 votes)
417 votes

This poll is no longer accepting votes

More info:


Also read:

4 Comments

  1. MJJ

    Newly elected Councilor Wil Fuentes, He makes no sense He must not be an American but a Communist with asking that Invocation and Pledge of Allegiance What is Wrong with Democrats.

    Reply
    1. Nike

      Bad news Mike. I’m sure that just about everybody here in CC has been made aware of the gross incompetence, massive stupidity, and failure to take responsibility in the major disaster in the uber upscale communities in the Smogopolis vicinity. Unfortunately for us, the same type of gross incompetents have been elected to every statewide office in Washington, as well as District 5.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *