
The Washington Interscholastic Activities Association (WIAA) has proposed a significant policy change that could reshape the landscape of high school sports. The proposal aims to limit participation in girls’ sports to students assigned female at birth while creating an open division for athletes of all gender identities. This potential shift has sparked debate across the state, with opinions ranging from support for fairness in competition to concerns about inclusivity.
We want to hear your thoughts! Take a moment to participate in our latest poll:
This is a complex and sensitive issue that impacts athletes, schools, and communities. For a deeper dive into the details of the WIAA’s proposal, check out our full story here:
WIAA board proposes to keep men out of women’s sports, create ‘open division’ for all gender identities

Your input matters, and we’d love to know where you stand on this important topic. Let us know your thoughts in the poll and share your perspective in the comments!
Also read:
- Opinion: Schools notifying parents about the kinds of care kids can decide on their own didn’t make itElizabeth New criticizes the removal of Amendment 1164 from current legislation, arguing it leaves parents uninformed about health care services accessed by their children through schools.
- Opinion: Off-road vehicles in the neighborhoodDoug Dahl responds to a resident’s concern about off-road vehicles on neighborhood streets, outlining the legal violations and safety risks involved.
- POLL: Is America more united or more divided than it was a decade ago?Clark County Today’s weekly poll asks: Is America more united or more divided today? The question comes after Stephen Davis brought a powerful message to Vancouver.
- Opinion: Revolution or revival?Nancy Churchill argues that Washington state is ground zero for a Marxist-style revolution but says a cultural revival is possible through personal responsibility and the America First movement.
- Letter: ‘It’s said sarcasm is the lowest form of wit’Amboy resident Thomas Schenk criticizes Olympia’s use of “emergency clauses” and other legislative tactics that limit public participation.