As discussions about the Interstate Bridge Replacement Project move forward, TriMet’s demands for light rail have sparked debate. In a recent story, bridge management defended TriMet’s position, arguing that light rail is essential for the region’s future. While some agree that it will improve public transportation and reduce congestion, others argue that expanding vehicle lanes or even adding a third bridge would be more effective. You can read the full story here. Now, we want to know your thoughts—take this week’s poll and let us know if you believe TriMet’s demands are justified.
More info:
Bridge management defends TriMet’s excessive demands for project
TriMet ridership remains far below pre-pandemic levels, showing a slow recovery after lockdowns decimated usage.
Read more
Also read:
- Opinion: Extending the Yellow MAX Line to Vancouver Is TriMet’s worst idea yet
John A. Charles Jr. critiques the Yellow MAX Line extension, urging legislators to remove light rail from the project. - How Should Washington Taxpayers Handle TriMet’s Proposed Light Rail Costs? Share Your Thoughts!
C-TRAN Board reviews TriMet’s proposal for Washington taxpayers to fund 45% of light rail operating costs, sparking local debate. - Public invited to Online Open House Safe Streets and Roads for All Safety Action PlanRTC launches an online open house to gather community input for improving transportation safety across Clark County.
- Light rail cost and tax increase revelations cause significant concerns for C-TRAN BoardC-TRAN Board raises concerns over TriMet’s demand for Washington taxpayers to cover $7 million in annual light rail costs for the IBR program.
- Work on SR 500 pedestrian overcrossing in Vancouver freezes for winterWork on SR 500 pedestrian overcrossing in Vancouver pauses for winter; access closed until spring with free shuttle available.
wpDiscuz
