![Ten times since 1934, Washington voters have said no to any kind of income taxes, including those targeting the wealthiest among us.](https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Large_Clark-County-Today-Will-Washington-voters-say-no.jpg)
Advocates are facing a daunting history of 10 straight rejections at the ballot box for income taxes
David Boze
Washington Policy Center
Ten times since 1934, Washington voters have said no to any kind of income taxes, including those targeting the wealthiest among us. Will it soon be 11?
![David Boze, Washington Policy Center](https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Mug_Clark-County-Today-David-Boze.jpg)
The effort to repeal the newly-instituted income tax on capital gains advanced today with the certification of more than enough signatures to make it to the ballot. The first stop though, is the state legislature where the legislative majority is expected to do nothing. That action (or inaction) will send it to the voters in the fall.
Advocates are facing a daunting history of 10 straight rejections at the ballot box for income taxes.
But this time, they have an advantage.
Despite the IRS confirming a capital gains tax is an income tax and despite every other state in the union and several other countries confirming they treat capital gains taxes as income taxes because … well, it’s the taxing of a form of income, the Washington State Supreme Court legitimized this political version of “Freaky Friday” and allowed Washington’s income tax on capital gains to become an “excise tax on capital gains.” This is an advantage unprecedented in the history of Washington’s income tax votes. Instead of being faced with truth in labeling, advocates will claim no “income tax” is on the line. I can imagine media sources “fact checking” opponents who call it an “income tax” and more.
Washington voters earned the right to decide — they also deserve an honest debate,
David Boze is the communications director at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Letter: For the public record and the Comprehensive PlanIn a July 12 letter to the Clark County Council, Clark County Citizens United President Susan Rasmussen shares that primary stakeholders were ignored in the Wetland and Habitat Ordinance Conservation Covenant.
- Opinion: Supreme Court gives Vancouver a new tool to use in its homelessness efforts, but will the city use it?Most Vancouver residents do not want homelessness to be criminalized but they do want a response when some in the homeless community commit crimes, and a new ruling by the United States Supreme court is a tool the city could use to help neighborhoods.
- Opinion: Has transit entered the “death spiral?”Transit ridership dropped sharply with the onset of the COVID pandemic in 2020. The slow rebound in the years that followed has prompted discussion, sometimes in hushed tones, as to whether transit had entered a “death spiral.”
- POLL: Should the city of Vancouver do more to protect citizens who have been victims of harassment, or worse, from those living homeless on the streets?Should the city of Vancouver do more to protect citizens who have been victims of harassment, or worse, from those living homeless on the streets?
- Opinion: How bad is freeway speeding?Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl answers a question about the commonplace of freeway speeding in Washington state.