Advocates are facing a daunting history of 10 straight rejections at the ballot box for income taxes
David Boze
Washington Policy Center
Ten times since 1934, Washington voters have said no to any kind of income taxes, including those targeting the wealthiest among us. Will it soon be 11?
The effort to repeal the newly-instituted income tax on capital gains advanced today with the certification of more than enough signatures to make it to the ballot. The first stop though, is the state legislature where the legislative majority is expected to do nothing. That action (or inaction) will send it to the voters in the fall.
Advocates are facing a daunting history of 10 straight rejections at the ballot box for income taxes.
But this time, they have an advantage.
Despite the IRS confirming a capital gains tax is an income tax and despite every other state in the union and several other countries confirming they treat capital gains taxes as income taxes because … well, it’s the taxing of a form of income, the Washington State Supreme Court legitimized this political version of “Freaky Friday” and allowed Washington’s income tax on capital gains to become an “excise tax on capital gains.” This is an advantage unprecedented in the history of Washington’s income tax votes. Instead of being faced with truth in labeling, advocates will claim no “income tax” is on the line. I can imagine media sources “fact checking” opponents who call it an “income tax” and more.
Washington voters earned the right to decide — they also deserve an honest debate,
David Boze is the communications director at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: ‘What has been revealed about TriMet in multiple Clark County Today articles over the past few years is eye-opening’
Rep. John Ley warns Clark County taxpayers about TriMet’s financial demands, urging the C-TRAN Board to reject costly commitments. - Opinion: K-12 Washington state education funding overview – Part 2
Washington’s K-12 education funding relies on mandates, many of which are underfunded or unfunded, shifting costs to local taxpayers. - Opinion: Senate Bill 5041 — a favor for unions — will harm safety net for workersA new proposal, Senate Bill 5041, seeks to extend unemployment benefits for striking workers, raising concerns about its impact on businesses and the workforce.
- POLL: Do you think schools should require teachers to ask students for their preferred pronouns?This week’s poll asks: Should schools require teachers to ask students for their preferred pronouns? Vote now and share your thoughts!
- Opinion: K-12 Washington state education funding overview – Part 1Larry Roe and Dick Rylander explore how K-12 education funding is structured in Washington state, from state budgets to local levies.
wpDiscuz
