Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center provides an update on the recent Universal Health Care Commission meeting
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
A large part of the Dec. 14 meeting of the Universal Health Care Commission (UHCC) was process again. Time was spent organizing the commission and its subcommittees around what it plans to focus on first, second and third as it paves a path to a taxpayer-financed, government-run system of health care.
That couldn’t have pleased the handful of people who showed up to give public comment that the UHCC was moving too slowly bringing them the new system and that they needed cheaper health care now. One public commenter pressuring the state commission said, “This is important. I’d like to see the commission acting like it’s important.”
Public commenters told the commission to follow an Oregon task force’s lead, to adopt ideas pushed by Whole Washington, a group that has sought to change the state’s system of health care via initiative, and Sen. Bob Hasegawa showed up to push his Senate Joint Memorial that would ask the federal government for “universal” health care or get it to allow the state to go it alone. Read Washington Policy Center’s caution against that misguided legislation last year. The commission should withhold its support and lawmakers should ignore SJM 8006 this coming legislative session. A fast track to a weaker, less-accessible, tax-heavy health care system is not what we need.
Commissioners reminded that moving to a taxpayer-financed, government-run system for all would take time, needed to be done biennium by biennium, and that a lot of the commission’s hoped–for progress had to do with political will, still-needed waivers and provider finessing. When discussing transitional plans, they talked about consolidating government-provided insurance plans, growth in those plans and the state increasing its Medicaid rolls.
Having more people not paying their way for health care is not something that should be congratulated or sought. In many cases, it will mean more people in Washington state are financially struggling. It also means taxpayers are taking on others’ health care bills. Safety nets are important and generously provided by taxpayers, but safety nets they should remain.
The impact of government-run, taxpayer-financed health care on cost-containment is not good. The impact on access and quality is worrisome.
The UHCC and the public need to acknowledge that health care costs money. Regulations make it more expensive. A third-party-payer system is harming us. And we need more people paying for health care, not fewer.
Health care also needs to be prioritized by state residents. It is one of our greatest needs, after all. Cost transparency can help make better-informed consumers. Competition and innovation can bring more cost-containment, access and quality. The commission isn’t focused on those things, however. At lawmakers’ direction, it is working on government-run health care instead, despite the harsh consequences that can be seen in other countries.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Letter: ‘There will be consequences’
Hazel Dell resident Bob Zak criticizes Democratic lawmakers for advancing ESSB 5181, arguing it undermines parental rights and defies biblical principles. - Op-Ed: La Center Schools — Committed to families and their children
In a public letter, the La Center School Board and Superintendent Peter Rosenkranz affirm their commitment to supporting families and honoring both state law and community values amid state-level scrutiny. - Letter: Mayor blames others on homelessness problem in Vancouver while she has enabled a lawless encampment zoneVancouver resident Peter Bracchi urges city leaders to enforce laws and end permissive policies that have allowed unsafe encampments to overrun public spaces near the Share House.
- Letter: ‘Look it up for yourself’Camas resident Anna Miller encourages skeptics of Elon Musk’s claims about government waste to do their own research using official resources.
- Opinion: Defending the indefensibleNancy Churchill argues that Washington’s lawsuit against a sheriff cooperating with ICE reveals a deeper political agenda that puts public safety at risk.
