Mark Harmsworth believes SB 5708 represents a significant overreach by the state government, with potentially damaging consequences for businesses and families
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
Senate Bill 5708 (SB 5708), introduced by Senator Frame (D), aimed at protecting minors online, is a prime example of government going too far. While safeguarding children online from inappropriate content is everyone’s goal, SB 5708 is deeply flawed and poses serious litigation risks to business and parental rights.
SB 5708 aims to protect minors online by regulating “addictive feeds” and “addictive internet-based services.” It would require online platforms to ‘estimate’ user age, apply privacy protections, and obtain parental consent for notifications. The bill would restrict data collection on identified minors but takes the first step in reducing parental oversight by parents by restricting access to some types of data from a minor’s social media account.
Rather than limiting the access of minors to “addictive feeds,” it limits parents’ ability to monitor their children’s use of social media.
An addictive feed is defined as a feed that a social media platform creates that uses algorithms to customize the feed content to an end user. An algorithm driven feed arguably provides a better user experience as the content is more relevant to the end user but comes with privacy concerns.
One of the concerning aspects of SB 5708 is its potential infringement on parental authority. While parents undoubtedly want to protect their children online, this bill shifts significant control to the state. By mandating specific privacy settings and imposing restrictions on how online services can interact with minors, the bill undermines parents’ ability to make informed decisions about their children’s online experiences. As an example, the bill calls for not collecting the minor’s location information which would be invaluable in a kidnapping or missing person case where the parent needs to locate the child’s whereabouts.
Additionally, the bill requires social media companies to “provide an obvious signal to the minor when the minor is being monitored or tracked,” by the “minor’s parent, guardian,” or others. The legislation actively makes it more difficult for parents to detect any dangerous interactions their children may be having online by warning minors that they are being watched.
Instead of imposing burdensome regulations, the legislature should focus on empowering parents with the tools and knowledge they need to navigate the online world safely. This includes promoting media literacy education, supporting the development of better parental control technologies, and fostering open communication between parents and children about online safety.
SB 5708 represents a significant overreach by the state government, with potentially damaging consequences for businesses and families. Rather than pursuing this misguided approach, the legislature should prioritize policies that promote innovation, respect parental rights, and empower individuals to make informed decisions about their online activities.
The bill had a hearing scheduled in the Senate on Feb. 26. You can sign up to testify and express your opinion here.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- WA Senate unanimously passes $7.3B capital budget ‘for the entire state’
The Washington Senate passed a $7.3 billion capital budget for 2025-27 in a unanimous vote, funding education, housing, and infrastructure across the state. - Vancouver mayor pro tem acknowledges the mayor ‘set the trap’ for Michelle Belkot
Audio reveals Vancouver mayor pro tem described mayor’s plan to provoke Belkot at C-TRAN meeting, sparking removal and lawsuits. - Opinion: An unacceptable tax burdenNancy Churchill outlines new tax proposals in Washington state, warning of growing burdens on working families amid budget shortfalls and government overspending.
- POLL: Is it time for new leadership at Vancouver City Hall?A new weekly poll asks whether Vancouver voters should prioritize replacing the mayor and city council in the 2025 election.
- Opinion: How will the majority party’s new budget and tax proposals affect you?Rep. John Ley critiques the state’s proposed 2025-27 budgets, warning of record-breaking tax hikes and economic impacts.
