Ridgefield School District has partially created its own capacity and overcrowding issues, according to Ridgefield resident Heidi Pozzo
Heidi Pozzo
for Clark County Today
Ridgefield School District has partially created its own capacity and overcrowding issues. In a prior article, I walked through a series of decisions the District made that impacted capacity related to the last bond.
Since then, the district has made more decisions that impact overcrowding. We need to understand those decisions so they are not repeated in the future.
In 2021-2022, Union Ridge Elementary School was 22 percent overcapacity and South Ridge Elementary School was 5 percent over. So the district understandably wanted to address the issue and rebalanced enrollment so the students were spread equally across schools. But the schools don’t have the same capacity.
Rebalancing put South Ridge 33 percent over capacity while Union Ridge dropped to 9 percent over capacity. The numbers don’t tell the whole story though. Union Ridge has an elementary school-sized gym and a middle school-sized gym, as well as two play areas. South Ridge has one elementary school-sized gym and one play area.
It is much more difficult for South Ridge to handle having its enrollment pushed so far over capacity than Union Ridge because it is a significantly smaller overall facility.
As the district contemplates rebalancing enrollment for a third elementary school, the plan is to spread students evenly across schools once again. Only this time, the rebalancing will create a significantly higher strain on South Ridge than the other schools.
By spreading students evenly across schools, Union Ridge and the new elementary will have significant room for growth. South Ridge, however, will only have room for 42 more students before reaching capacity. And South Ridge is the school that has been growing the fastest.
By not looking at growth rates and capacity for each school, the district has been driving overcrowding at South Ridge.
To be clear, as I’ve stated in the past, there is a need for another elementary school. The existing elementary schools have reached the point where it is difficult to manage the populations. However, there are a number of issues with the proposed school and the propositions that are up for a vote.
Whichever path the voters choose, the district should keep growth rates, school design and capacity in mind to not unfairly burden any one school.
Heidi Pozzo has been a Ridgefield resident for 16 years. She is a concerned citizen who would like students to get a good education and thinks we can do it in a more cost-effective way.
Also read:
- Opinion: Courts blocking the Kroger-Albertson merger won’t stop consumers from making choicesPaul Guppy of Washington Policy Center critiques judicial rulings that block the Kroger-Albertsons merger, citing changing consumer trends and potential job losses.
- Opinion: Workers need money — and the many other gifts work can bringElizabeth New Hovde discusses the value of work, its benefits for workers and employers, and its impact on personal growth.
- How Should Washington Taxpayers Handle TriMet’s Proposed Light Rail Costs? Share Your Thoughts!C-TRAN Board reviews TriMet’s proposal for Washington taxpayers to fund 45% of light rail operating costs, sparking local debate.
- Opinion: Get ready for the 2025 legislative sessionNancy Churchill emphasizes the importance of citizen participation as the 2025 Washington legislative session begins.
- Opinion: Thousands of Republicans didn’t vote. Why?Amboy resident Thomas Schenk discusses low Republican voter turnout and election concerns in Clark County.