Regardless of the new study, Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center states why it’s important for all of us to reflect on how tax rates rise over time

Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center

A meeting Friday morning about the WA Cares’ Fund highlighted hope that the state’s long-term-care program is now projected to remain solvent with its current payroll tax rate, given the latest actuarial analysis. A study done two years ago — before taxpayers knew about WA Cares and before widespread concern about how the program will add a new payroll tax — showed insolvency. Washington state officials were concerned about the fund being able to pay its way.

Sen. Curtis King, R-Yakima, sits on the Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) Trust Commission and still has valid concerns.

After asking for clarification about some of the study’s finer points, including whether or not the study’s positive outcome has the law being amended to allow people who pay into WA Cares for years to see a benefit if they move out of state (it did not), King said: “I have to tell you that I’m skeptical that we can do a financial analysis or the Milliman analysis and have it come out so that we end up at .58, which is where we wanted it to be and where we started.”  

Regardless of the new study, it’s important for all of us to reflect on how tax rates rise over time. For example, the payroll tax rate for the state’s paid family and medical leave has doubled in just a few short years. We should be aware that allowing a new tax for a fund that won’t help solve our long-term-care crisis in the way promised is asking for more of the same.

See more about the tax’s cost-shifting and misplaced burden on low-income wage earners, as well as the long-term-care program’s inadequate and “maybe you’ll see it” lifetime benefit, here. Past and future meeting information for the commission overseeing the state’s long-term-care law and a payroll tax that begins in July 2023 is available here. 

Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.

---

Also read:

• 
  Letter: ‘It’s said sarcasm is the lowest form of wit’
  Amboy resident Thomas Schenk criticizes Olympia’s use of “emergency clauses” and other legislative tactics that limit public participation.
• 
  Letter: ‘We’re going to give them some money and a plane ticket, and then we’re going to work with them’
  Camas resident Anna Miller supports a new structured self-deportation policy, calling it a balanced approach to immigration and economic needs.
• 
  Opinion: What the 2025 legislature tells us about why Washington’s government keeps failing
  Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center argues that Washington’s government fails because it resists humility, experimentation, and accountability in its policymaking.
• 
  Letter: Vancouver needs broader leadership than just a teacher’s lens
  Vancouver resident Peter Bracchi urges Mayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle not to seek another term, calling for more diverse and inclusive leadership rooted in broader experiences.
• 
  Opinion: Legislative session ‘was full of ups and downs and many learning experiences’
  Rep. John Ley reflects on the 2025 legislative session, highlighting local funding victories and warning of major tax increases passed by the majority.