Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center believes it is not OK to treat people who are unvaccinated as dangerous, selfish and unworthy of work
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
State agencies are being required to mistreat a group of people in our state, and members of the Legislature’s majority party don’t appear willing to stop it.
Several bills proposed this legislative session address an outdated and misguided governor directive that won’t allow people who have not received a COVID-19 vaccination to work in the state’s executive and small cabinet agencies. Those agencies include the Department of Transportation and the Washington State Patrol, both of which were hard hit by the vaccine mandate in emergency orders. A “permanent” vaccine mandate is now in place, and it applies not just to current and former workers, but to future workers, as well. That’s a problem for a state with workforce issues that harm service levels that taxpayers expect.
The Department of Health’s COVID-19 vaccination dashboard reports that 30 percent of the state’s total population has not completed a COVID-19 primary series. Excluding a good percentage of the state’s total population from being considered for these state jobs because they lack a vaccination that cannot stop the spread or contraction of a disease is more than problematic. It is indefensible, given all we now know about COVID-19 and the vaccines’ strengths and limitations. It is indefensible when we know that COVID-19 is most injurious and deadly to people in elderly, not working-age, populations. Lawmakers need to intervene.
How Gov. Jay Inslee was allowed to dictate this permanent vaccine mandate should also be concerning to all the state’s residents. Could the government mandate how much exercise state employees have? How much red meat they eat? What kind of car they can drive? The list of ways to keep a workforce healthier, as is being justified for the COVID-19 vaccine mandate, is endless.
This unnecessary and discriminatory limitation on future employment would be eradicated with the passage of House Bill 1801. Other bills would deal with correcting some of the state’s past wrongs when it comes to the nearly 1,900 state workers whose careers ended because of the vaccine mandate, and I don’t expect them to go anywhere. But allowing prospective employees to be free of an outdated mandate should be appealing to all lawmakers. The elimination of the employment exclusion would also bring us in line with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which no longer differentiates between vaccinated and unvaccinated people in its policy recommendations.
People lost careers, family budgets were harmed and taxpayer-funded and -expected service levels suffered because of the governor’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate on state employment. That mandate, and the government’s clear disdain for the unvaccinated, also had a ripple effect on local governments, private businesses, families and communities.
It’s past time for lawmakers to stand up and protect this minority group of unvaccinated people in our state. It is not OK to treat people who are unvaccinated as dangerous, selfish and unworthy of work.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- Opinion: Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund dodged a Boeing-size bulletElizabeth New (Hovde) discusses the implications of the Boeing strike and the push for unemployment insurance for striking workers in Washington stat
- Opinion: Riding bikes in the darkDoug Dahl addresses bike safety laws and the importance of visibility for cyclists riding at night.
- Letter: ‘The current bridge plan hurts economic development on BOTH sides of the river’Sam Churchill from Hayden Island shares his concerns over the economic impact of the current I-5 Bridge replacement proposal on both sides of the river.
- Letter: ‘We students are counting on voters to show up to the polls again’Vancouver’s Tammy Pham urges voters to reject I-2109, safeguarding essential education funding and youth opportunities.
- POLL: Should Clark County increase surveillance or add security at all ballot drop box locations?Clark County Today’s weekly poll asks if increased security measures at ballot drop boxes are necessary to boost voter confidence or if the cost is too high.