Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center explains why lawmakers should be interested in repealing both paid family and medical leave and the long-term-care program and payroll tax
Elizabeth Hovde
Washington Policy Center
As expected, a decrease in pay is on the way for most W2 workers. The payroll tax rate for Washington state’s paid family and medical leave is going up to 0.8% in January — a 33 percent increase in the tax rate.
Workers already saw a tax increase for the social program last January when it grew to 0.6% from the 0.4% state lawmakers and the public were sold when the law for paid leave was enacted. The program isn’t paying its way and isn’t expected to in the future. The Employment Security Department said in a mailing to employers, “To keep pace with more people using the program, and as required by law, the premium rate will increase in 2023.”
Add this tax increase to a 0.58%-plus payroll tax promised for a state-mandated long-term-care program that’s on the way in July, and $1.38 of every $100 most people earn will be taken for new social programs that many Washington workers won’t benefit from and that aren’t reserved for low-income workers. In fact, in some cases, low-income workers will be funding paid time off of work for child bonding or family-member care for people who make more money than they do and who might not need taxpayer dollars.
Social program via payroll tax is no way to treat Washington workers: Penalizing work isn’t wise.
Lawmakers should be interested in repealing both paid family and medical leave and the long-term-care program and payroll tax. They aren’t set up for people in need, they have solvency problems and they unfairly take wages from workers who may never need, use or want the program.
Elizabeth Hovde is a policy analyst and the director of the Centers for Health Care and Worker Rights at the Washington Policy Center. She is a Clark County resident.
Also read:
- POLL: How would you rate the accessibility of Vancouver city officials for addressing community concerns?
How accessible are Vancouver city officials to community concerns? - Opinion: New audit offers another reason lawmakers should leave the state’s paid-leave program behindElizabeth New (Hovde) critiques Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave program, highlighting audit findings of double-dipping and program inefficiencies.
- Opinion: WA turns redder, despite faulty media reports that said otherwiseWAGOP highlights gains in Washington’s November 2024 election, challenging claims the state turned “bluer.”
- Opinion: New FCC Chairman indicates shakeup for internet policyFCC Chairman Brendan Carr signals major shifts in internet policy, from net neutrality to rural broadband and tech regulations.
- Opinion: John Ley pens letter to Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg
John Ley challenges the I-5 Bridge Replacement project, urging Secretary Pete Buttigieg to reconsider federal funding.
