Todd Myers of the Washington Policy Center says that using forest fires to justify the CO2 tax is a smokescreen
Todd Myers
Washington Policy Center
In his editorial on Washington’s CO2 tax, Dr. Vin Gupta claims he likes “to go to the data to find the truth.” But he starts by saying something false.
He claims Spokane has “declining air quality.” This is false. EPA data for Spokane County show that since 2000, average levels of particulate matter have fallen by more than 20% – from “moderate” to consistently “good.”
He clearly didn’t look at the data.
In fact, air quality will continue to improve without the CO2 tax. In 2019, the Puget Sound Clean Air Agency released a report on a proposal for a low-carbon fuel standard showing the impact of the policy on air quality. The study found that between 2019 and 2030 there would be a significant reduction in particulate matter (PM2.5) under the business as usual (BAU) scenario. This was two years before the Climate Commitment Act had been proposed.
Air quality will be better in 2030 with or without the CO2 tax.
Additionally, he says the CO2 tax would reduce the risk of smoke from catastrophic wildfire. Of the $3.2 billion from the CO2 tax, only $12 million – just 0.4% of the tax revenue – is budgeted to go to forest health. By way of comparison, more is spent on funding for government planning than forest health.
If preventing catastrophic wildfire was truly important, the legislature would have used more of the nearly $20 billion in new tax revenue the state received in the past four years.
Instead, the largest threat to projects that reduce the risk of wildfire are the very environmental groups supporting the CO2 tax. When the Colville Confederated Tribes worked with the Forest Service to thin unhealthy forests on their border, Spokane-based environmental groups immediately sued – preventing efforts to improve forest health and prevent catastrophic wildfires.
Using forest fires to justify the CO2 tax is a smokescreen.
Todd Myers is the vice president for research at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: An unacceptable tax burden
Nancy Churchill outlines new tax proposals in Washington state, warning of growing burdens on working families amid budget shortfalls and government overspending. - POLL: Is it time for new leadership at Vancouver City Hall?A new weekly poll asks whether Vancouver voters should prioritize replacing the mayor and city council in the 2025 election.
- Opinion: How will the majority party’s new budget and tax proposals affect you?Rep. John Ley critiques the state’s proposed 2025-27 budgets, warning of record-breaking tax hikes and economic impacts.
- Opinion: Washington’s EV sales far short of next year’s state mandate
Todd Myers highlights how Washington’s EV sales fall short of next year’s mandate, raising concerns over rising car prices and limited options. - Letter: ‘Our state and local governments need to learn to live within their means’Camas resident Lauren Colas voices strong opposition to Proposition 1 and other tax proposals, calling for state and local governments to rein in spending.
