Mark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center believes House Bill 1628 will not solve housing affordability in either the ownership, rental or commercial real estate markets
Mark Harmsworth
Washington Policy Center
House Bill 1628 (HB 1628), currently stuck in committee in the House of Representatives, is being thrown around as another way for the legislature to increase taxes this year. Despite significant push back from Washington residents, relators and other industry groups, HB 1628 would raise taxes on the sale on homes.
House Bill 1628 (HB 1628) creates a new property tax category of 4% on property valued at over $5 million.
Proponents of HB 1628 argue that a property owner that sells property that is valued at over $5 million can afford to pay the additional tax rate. The majority of properties, however, that are sold and valued over $5 million, are multi-unit housing, apartments, duplexes, retail and commercial properties which provide homes, products and services for every Washington resident.
Simple demand and supply economics show that by redistributing taxes (and in the case of House Bill 1628, increasing taxes) will not decrease prices.
The legislature needs to pass legislation that promotes the availability of new housing rather than subsidizing the housing that is already built. Simple changes to the Growth Management Act (GMA), by modifying the arbitrary growth boundaries and population density goals set by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) will increase available land and the ability for more affordable housing to be built.
House Bill 1628 will not solve housing affordability in either the ownership, rental or commercial real estate markets. It will, in the long term, only continue to increase the cost of housing, products and services.
For WPC’s recommendations on how to increase housing affordability and availability, without increasing fees and taxes, click here.
Mark Harmsworth is the director of the Small Business Center at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: K-12 Washington state education funding overview – Part 1
Larry Roe and Dick Rylander explore how K-12 education funding is structured in Washington state, from state budgets to local levies. - Opinion: Look for common ground: It can be found even in a lopsided, trifecta state
Elizabeth New (Hovde) explores bipartisan efforts in Washington state’s government, highlighting cost-saving measures and legislation focused on efficiency. - Letter: ‘One can only imagine what an income tax would provide for the big spenders in Olympia’Amboy resident Thomas Schenk criticizes government spending and warns of the potential consequences of an income tax in Washington state.
- Opinion: Citizen activism worksNancy Churchill discusses the power of citizen activism in influencing legislative decisions and stopping controversial bills in Washington state.
- Opinion: Scientific approach needed for gender-affirming careJay Fratt discusses the NHS Cass Review and its impact on gender-affirming care, calling for a science-based approach in Washington state.
