The district’s Board of Directors is asking voters to consider the same requests that were rejected in the Feb. 14 special election
Dick Rylander
SWWEducation.org
In February, the Washougal School Board asked voters to approve two levies. We ran an article sharing both the Pros and Cons. You can read it by clicking this link: Washougal School District Feb 2023 Levy’s (swweducation.org) Both levy’s failed … but it was close. Now, the district is once again putting the levy requests before voters in the April 25 special election.
The law allows a school board to go to the voters up to two times in a calendar year. Most boards go to the voters in February in a special election for two reasons. First, if the levy fails they can go back a second time. (The windows are February, April, August and November). Almost all districts use April as the second date so they know what their Fall budget/funding will look like. Second, people haven’t received their new property taxes statements so they are more likely to approve a new tax increase.
What’s different about the April levy requests vs. the February levies? Nothing. No reduction.
Let’s start this analysis by sharing the link to the Clark County elections department webpage that has links to the measures passed by the school board: April 25, 2023 Special Election | Clark County (wa.gov) There you can read the exact language of what was submitted.
Ballots will be mailed on April 7 and are due no later than 8 p.m., April 25.
Here’s the link to the sample ballot: APR 2023 SAMPLE BALLOT.pdf (wa.gov)
Let’s start out by sharing the Pro (yes) statements and rebuttals:
Washougal School District – Prop 12 Statement in Favor – Rebuttal
Washougal School District – Prop 13 – Statement in Favor – Rebuttal
Now, let’s share the Con (No) statements:
Washougal School District April 2023 Proposition 12 EP&O No Position
Washougal April 2023 Proposition 13 Levy – No Position
Analysis/Comments:
What will the Yes team focus on?
1. Teachers will be laid off. Sports will be cut. Roofs and buildings will fall apart. Technology will fail. Class sizes will increase with 40 teachers heads on the chopping block! Arts programs will fade away.
Side note: It appears that the district has lost about 6% of their student population in the past 3 years. This works out to about 170 students. Each student generates about $12,000 in revenue from the State. That works out to about $2 million/year as a shortfall. This is actually lower than surrounding districts (Evergreen has lost over 12% of students). This will lead to a reduction in workforce because there are fewer students. They don’t tell you that.
2. They will claim this is not a new levy but rather an extension of the expiring levy. However, both levy’s ask for more money. Logically, how can a levy for a new period of time for more money not be new? This is an intentional misdirection that is an attempt to get you to believe nothing has changed…which is simply not true. THEY WANT A LOT MORE MONEY.
3. They want you to focus on the “rate”. Note that they project a “rate” of $1.99 per $1000 of assessed property value. They will claim that’s a low rate and your taxes will not go up. In reality that “rate” is meaningless. Worse, it’s an intentional redirect and misdirection. Why, you ask? Because:
- They are asking for a fixed amount of money for a fixed period of time so the “rate” has no impact or value.
- The amount of money is divided by the total assessed value of all properties in the school district. The result? If property values go up the amount of money collected stays the same but the “rate” drops. On the other hand, if property values were to decline the amount of money collected stays the same but the “rate” goes UP! So, in the end they want you to focus on the “rate” instead of the fact that the actual amount of money being collected (in both levy’s) is UP. That’s what you need to focus on…how much higher are the new levy’s than the old and are you ok with that increase?
4. Here’s the exact statement from their Website: Proposed Levies on April 25 Ballot Would Fund Essential Student-Centered Programs – WSD (washougal.k12.wa.us)
- Washougal School District is proposing two levies on the April 25 ballot. These are NOT new taxes. Proposed EP&O and Capital Levy rates are LOWER than what Washougal approved in 2020 ($2.14 and $0.22.) Rates are per $1,000 of assessed property value.
- As you can see they are claiming that the new HIGHER levy amounts, based on the “rate” of $1.99 is LOWER than the 2020 rate of $2.14. Isn’t that incredible? More money but a lower rate…how can that be? Answer: The assessed value of properties in the school district increased at a faster rate than the increase in the levy amounts. So what? This is the misdirection and sleight of hand. Taxes are going up. Please take the time to understand this truth. When they ask more you pay more.
How is the school district doing for test scores and other “report card” factors? Check this link: https://washingtonstatereportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/ReportCard/ViewSchoolOrDistrict/100286 What will you see in the link?
How does Washougal compare to some other school districts in Clark County?
- As you can see Washougal already has the third highest spend per student (even more than Evergreen which is the largest district and has announced cuts of 140 personnel due to loss of students).
- Attendance is the third worst
- Test scores put them in the middle of the pack
- Next door Camas (to give credit where it’s due) spends over $2,000 LESS per year/student with the test scores much better
- Comparing Washougal with Hockinson, Woodland, Camas and Ridgefield we see that in nearly every area of comparison Washougal is spending $2,000 to $4,000 more per student vs. comparable size districts in southwest Washington with, in a number of test scores, doing worse. WITHOUT this increase.
If you are a “data” person stop by the website in this link and get ammunition: Washougal School District | The School Data Project.
You can also look at the “cost impact analysis” of the levies in this link: School District Measures April 25th 2023 | The School Data Project.
So … what says that giving more money makes sense? Perhaps the REAL need is to focus on academics? Washougal needs to go under a magnifying glass and find ways to spend less and improve results.
If taxpayers continue to give more money without changes it sends the wrong message. Perhaps vote NO because you really love children enough to show tough love?
Finally, on the home budget, mortgage/rent, front how much did your property tax bills go up? Have you looked at it? Ours went up $1100! Almost $100 more per month on a fixed income. What will we cut spending on to pay higher taxes? How’s your income doing?
Whatever you do, vote. Get as much information as possible. Ask questions. Don’t accept anything at face value. Challenge every fact and statement and claim. It’s your money and your choice.
Also read:
- Opinion: Washington state paid $8.6 million a year in unnecessary Medicaid premiumsWashington state’s Medicaid program wastes $8.6M annually on duplicate premiums; reforms are needed.
- Opinion: Extending the Yellow MAX Line to Vancouver Is TriMet’s worst idea yetJohn A. Charles Jr. critiques the Yellow MAX Line extension, urging legislators to remove light rail from the project.
- Opinion: Courts blocking the Kroger-Albertson merger won’t stop consumers from making choicesPaul Guppy of Washington Policy Center critiques judicial rulings that block the Kroger-Albertsons merger, citing changing consumer trends and potential job losses.
- Opinion: Workers need money — and the many other gifts work can bringElizabeth New Hovde discusses the value of work, its benefits for workers and employers, and its impact on personal growth.
- How Should Washington Taxpayers Handle TriMet’s Proposed Light Rail Costs? Share Your Thoughts!C-TRAN Board reviews TriMet’s proposal for Washington taxpayers to fund 45% of light rail operating costs, sparking local debate.