Donald Kimball of the Washington Policy Center believes that allowing a program like Education Savings Accounts would free families from being stuck in a system they mistrust and help their students succeed
Donald Kimball
Washington Policy Center
The 2023-2024 K-12 Report Card has been released by OSPI, and the results continue the pattern of the past few years.
Based on Smarter Balanced standardized testing, only 50.3% of students were considered on track in English, 39.7% in Math, and 43.5% in Science. Last year, the scores were 50.7% in English, 39.1% in Math, and 42.9% in Science.
These scores indicate there hasn’t been any serious improvement for public school students since the learning loss from school closures during the pandemic.
Superintendent Reykdahl has been critical of Smarter Balanced assessment and standardized testing broadly, arguing the numbers don’t tell the whole story of a student’s development. Even still, with the public school system a few years past the COVID closures and spending over $18,000 per student, it would be expected that these numbers, even if imperfect, would improve.
Rather than continuing to believe that spending more money on the current system will suddenly improve student learning, parents should be allowed to take the money and direct it in the most effective way possible. This would allow parents who are happy with these scores to keep their children in the public schools, but allow other parents to choose options they feel better suit the needs of their child.
If their student is excelling in their public school, the system already caters to their needs. If, however, these new results cause alarm, allowing a program like Education Savings Accounts would free families from being stuck in a system they mistrust and help their students succeed.
Donald Kimball is the communications manager and text exchange editor at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Opinion: Washington state paid $8.6 million a year in unnecessary Medicaid premiums
Washington state’s Medicaid program wastes $8.6M annually on duplicate premiums; reforms are needed. - Opinion: Extending the Yellow MAX Line to Vancouver Is TriMet’s worst idea yet
John A. Charles Jr. critiques the Yellow MAX Line extension, urging legislators to remove light rail from the project. - Opinion: Courts blocking the Kroger-Albertson merger won’t stop consumers from making choicesPaul Guppy of Washington Policy Center critiques judicial rulings that block the Kroger-Albertsons merger, citing changing consumer trends and potential job losses.
- Opinion: Workers need money — and the many other gifts work can bringElizabeth New Hovde discusses the value of work, its benefits for workers and employers, and its impact on personal growth.
- How Should Washington Taxpayers Handle TriMet’s Proposed Light Rail Costs? Share Your Thoughts!C-TRAN Board reviews TriMet’s proposal for Washington taxpayers to fund 45% of light rail operating costs, sparking local debate.
wpDiscuz
