

Clark County resident Rob Anderson shares his thoughts on the proposed charter amendments
Rob Anderson, founder
Reform Clark County
Auditor Greg Kimsey is at it again. It wasn’t enough that he architected a flawed Home Rule Charter that concentrated power in the executive branch of Clark County, leading to several waves of amendments to correct glaring omissions and issues. Now, Kimsey has initiated two new charter amendments, No. 17 and 18, which would fundamentally shift power away from the people and into the hands of a select few government officials. These amendments are dangerous overreaches, supported mainly by government insiders, that would limit citizen-led initiatives and undermine fairly represented elections. We must vote NO to protect our rights and prevent the concentration of power in the hands of a few.
Amendment No. 18: An Underhanded Attack on the Right to Petition
The Washington State Constitution guarantees that the right to petition “shall never be abridged.” Yet, Amendment No. 18 stealthily does exactly that. This proposal would dramatically expand the power of government officials — specifically the County Auditor and Prosecuting Attorney — to restrict future citizen initiatives. By introducing additional subject limitations with vague language like “however, this is not a complete list,” officials would have expanded authority to inject their legal opinions and financial estimates into the petition process before a single vote is cast. Worse still, there would be no appeal process for these potentially biased opinions and estimates.
Imagine trying to bring a critical issue to the ballot, only to have it blocked or crippled by a handful of government insiders who claim it’s legally or financially problematic. These officials could suppress petitions that challenge their own authority, with no opportunity for citizens to push back. This is a blatant attempt to consolidate control and limit public participation in shaping Clark County’s future.
Clark County already imposes more restrictions on citizen initiatives than any other charter county in Washington. This amendment, the third since 2015, would make it even harder for ordinary citizens to have a say in local governance. Think about it: with the existing requirements, not a single initiative has made it onto the ballot in the past almost 10 years. Yet, this is another attempt to further restrict the initiative process — the only direct self-governance tool citizens have. We must protect this vital process, which holds elected officials accountable when they fail to address key issues. Voting NO on Amendment 18 ensures that the people — not politicians — remain in charge of our government.
Amendment No. 17: A Power Grab That Threatens Fair Representation
Amendment No. 17 would undermine the fairness of our elections by overhauling the redistricting process. Currently, redistricting in Clark County is managed by a bipartisan committee, with both major political parties submitting candidates to ensure balance. This system, while not perfect, prevents any single party from controlling how district lines are drawn. Amendment 17 would destroy that balance by giving the County Council — dominated by whichever party controls the majority — lopsided control over the selection process.
This amendment introduces vague and untested redistricting criteria, making it more susceptible to gerrymandering districts. Even worse, it shifts power away from the current bipartisan committee to a “redistricting master,” a county GIS employee, and a new committee entirely selected by the County Council. This supermajority requirement to alter redistricting proposals effectively centralizes control in the hands of a few.
This amendment isn’t about creating a better system — it’s about consolidating power in the hands of the political elite. We must reject this amendment to preserve the integrity of our redistricting process and ensure that our elections remain fair and balanced.
The Choice is Clear: Vote NO
Amendments No. 17 and 18 are attempts to erode the rights of Clark County citizens while concentrating power within government officials. We cannot allow these dangerous changes to take root. By voting NO, we safeguard our right to petition, protect fair and balanced representation in our elections, and ensure that government remains accountable to the people — not the other way around.
Reject both amendments and please share this with others. Vote NO to stop the power grab in Clark County. Learn more at reformclarkcounty.com.
Also read:
- Public comment prevails: No action taken on Clerk agenda item at Clark County Council meetingClark County Council declined to advance a proposal to make the County Clerk position appointed, deferring the issue to the Charter Review Commission after public concerns over transparency.
- Opinion: ‘Today’s Democratic Party is not our father’s Democratic Party’Editor Ken Vance reflects on how today’s Democratic Party diverges from the values he associates with his father’s generation, citing issues like taxation, gender policies, and shifting ideology in Washington state politics.
- Trump signs ‘big, beautiful bill’ during White House July 4 celebrationPresident Trump signed the “big, beautiful bill” on July 4 during a White House event featuring a military flyover and Republican leaders.
- Opinion: Your cost of living is about to go up as the majority party’s new taxes and fees kick inRep. John Ley shares a legislative update on rising costs across Washington, including gas taxes, childcare, housing, and business impacts. He highlights concerns about state spending and new transportation policies.
- US Senate narrowly passes GOP megabill after overnight session, sending it to HouseVice President JD Vance cast the deciding vote on a sweeping GOP tax and spending package that now heads back to the House, sparking reactions across the aisle.
BTW… Charter amendment #16 is another byproduct of Auditor Kimsey’s poor job in drafting the Home Rule Charter, which he claimed responsibility for at the hearings a few months ago. I support Charter Amendment #16 because I don’t think a law enforcement officer (deputy) should have to take a pay cut to become Sheriff.
Per the Home Rule Charter an elected Charter Review Commission is tasked with reviewing the charter at least every 5 years, and then proposing charter amendments to the voters. For the auditor to circumvent the established Charter Review Commission, and formulate his own recommendations instead is unusual. After researching these extensive changes, they are clearly detrimental to fair citizen participation in local decisions that impact us all. I plan to REJECT Charter Amendments No. 17&18.