Brush Prairie resident Bob Mattila doesn’t favor light rail, but he says if we can’t have a new I-5 Bridge without it, it should be put on the newer existing bridge
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
If we are ever going to get a new I-5 Bridge over the Columbia River, we need to start using some common sense in designing it. The biggest problem, I think, is the pipe dream of putting light rail on it. I don’t favor light rail, but if we can’t have a new bridge without it, put it on the newer existing bridge, the southbound one, or on the railroad bridge, a mile downriver.
The Coast Guard wants a clearance of 178 feet. The Federal Aviation Administration, (the two airports), wants 116 feet maximum height. Anything higher would make it too steep for light rail. The 178 feet might conflict with the airplane traffic from the two airports on both sides of the river. Leave the light rail off and try to get the Coast Guard and the airports to compromise with maybe 150 feet, or something similar.
Almost everything we do consists of compromises, so it’s time to make some reasonable compromises to get the bridge built, or it will never get done. I-5 veers to the east on both sides of the river so build the first new bridge on the east side. First build one bridge wide enough for five lanes. Then remove the existing northbound bridge, using the new bridge for the Northbound traffic, and build the second, (Southbound), bridge in its place with five lanes.
Bob Mattila
Brush Prairie
Also read:
- Expect delays on eastbound SR 14 West Camas Slough Bridge for annual inspection, Saturday
Annual inspection will close the eastbound lane of SR 14 in Camas. - C-TRAN seeks public’s input on September 2025 Service Change Concepts
C-TRAN is gathering public input on 2025 service changes, including new routes and expanding its on-demand ride-share, The Current. - Expect delays on eastbound SR 14 for safety repairs, April 2Expect delays April 2 on eastbound SR 14 for guardrail repairs near Camas.
- Belkot files suit against Clark County, alleging civil rights violations, breaches to open meeting lawsClark County Councilor Michelle Belkot claims she was removed from the C-TRAN Board of Directors after she intended to vote to protect taxpayers Clark County Councilor Michelle Belkot filed a lawsuit in Skamania County Superior Court against Clark County on Friday, citing violations of the Civil Rights Act, Open Public Meetings Act, and Quo Warranto …
- Clark County hosting April 10 open house about the Northeast Delfel Road realignment projectClark County to host April 10 open house on Delfel Road project, replacing signals with a roundabout.
Bob –
Interesting.
Regarding “The Federal Aviation Administration, (the two airports), wants 116 feet maximum height. Anything higher would make it too steep for light rail. The 178 feet might conflict with the airplane traffic from the two airports on both sides of the river.”
The top of the current bridges is above 200 feet, and the FAA doesn’t have a problem with the current bridge height.
Just a thought.
Research the tunnel from Denmark to Germany. And the numerous other bridge projects in Denmark. Why is it so expensive in Washington/Oregon to get a relatively small bridge built? Honest question. Just would love an explanation.
We do NOT need to replace this existing bridge so long as Portlandia REFUSES to make the required upgrades to it’s currently inadequate highway system. What’s really needed is a NEW bridge east of the current 205 bridge and maybe a NEW bridge south of the Longview bridge. Portlandia is the problem, NOT the bridge.