Hayden Island resident Sam Churchill disputes the assertions made by IBR program Administrator Greg Johnson
Editor’s note: Opinions expressed in this letter to the editor are those of the author alone and do not reflect the editorial position of ClarkCountyToday.com
Mr. Greg Johnson, the Interstate Bridge Replacement program administrator, made a two-part video with “Ten reasons why a tunnel wouldn’t work at this location.”
The video is helpful. I appreciate the effort. But I’m not convinced:
(1) The Vancouver BC tunnel, now planned for under the Fraser River, has similar characteristics to our location, but is more cost/effective then their original bridge proposal. It costs $4.1B total — and NO toll! Their tunnel is NOT DOUBLE the cost. It’s HALF the cost of our proposed Columbia River bridge.
(2) Cars enter/leave the tunnel on their island (for potential direct island access).
(3) It does NOT require raising up an entire 5 mile length of freeway AND building steep access ramps to the raised freeway — in EXTREMELY earthquake prone sandy soil. That saves $2.5 Billion right there.
(4) Mr. Johnson needs a shallow grade for the Max train. What if there were NO Max trains? Instead, shuttles move people. Electric van pooling. No Max to Vancouver, WA. That saves another $2 billion.
(5) Since the IBR plans a new main river channel, the immersed tube could be close to the surface near the Vancouver shore. It would surface BEFORE the East/West railroad line. NO height restrictions!
Mr. Johnson makes a good point on personal safety. I think it can be addressed with free electric shuttle vehicles on the active transportation areas.
This tall bridge and corresponding raised freeway is ugly. It hurts economic development on both sides of the river. It reminds me of Seattle’s Alaskan Way, which has now been permanently torn down, stimulating NEW waterfront attractions.
Let’s lower the cost. Enhance livability. The IBR plan IS a disaster. We’ll ALL pay for it.
Sam Churchill
Hayden Island resident
Also read:
- Belkot speaks before C-TRAN board; directors pause vote on light rail funding language until July
Michelle Belkot spoke at Tuesday’s C-TRAN board meeting, calling her removal from the board unlawful; directors postponed a vote on light rail funding language until July amid legal challenges. - Travel Advisory: Expect delays on northbound I-5 near RidgefieldWSDOT is warning travelers to expect delays near Exit 14 on northbound I-5 in Ridgefield as crews begin barrier and lane improvement work supporting future development.
- Large crowd expected at C-TRAN Board of Directors Meeting Tuesday, April 15
A large turnout is expected at the April 15 C-TRAN board meeting, where public input and a key vote on light rail funding will follow the recent removal of Michelle Belkot. - Letter: ‘The IBR needs a more cost-effective design’Bob Ortblad argues the I-5 Bridge replacement project is overbudget and inefficient, urging a more cost-effective tunnel alternative to avoid excessive tolls and taxpayer burden.
- Clark County beginning installation of upgraded traffic signals in mid-April
Clark County will begin upgrading multiple traffic and pedestrian signals in mid-April to improve safety, accessibility, and transportation technology.
There are quite a few immersed multi lane tunnels in the Netherlands and other European countries for cars and trains and they work way better than bridges because of ship traffic.