Tuesday night’s slim lead was enough for supporters to say they were ‘confident’ of victory

Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington

In initial Tuesday night returns, Initiative 2066, which aims to ensure natural gas remains an energy choice in Washington state, was leading by a margin of 51.2% to 48.7%.

I-2066 is one of four initiatives backed by the conservative political group Let’s Go Washington. 

Tuesday night’s slim lead was enough for supporters to say they were “confident” of victory. 

“I think the margin looks good right now and we’ll end up winning,” said Greg Lane, Vice President of the Building Industry Association of Washington, in a Tuesday night interview with The Center Square. 

“We’re sending a message to the legislature that we need to protect natural gas as an energy source for the state of Washington,” said Lane, who noted other states have been reaching out for help because of similar policies attempting to ban natural gas elsewhere. 

Backers of the measure turned in more than 546,000 back in July after only 50 days to gather signatures. The shortened time was the result of a legal challenge from opponents. 

The approval of 2066 will prohibit the state and all local governments from banning, restricting or discouraging the use of natural gas in new or existing homes or commercial buildings.

The ultimately successful effort to get I-2066 on the ballot was prompted by concerns over the passage of House Bill 1589 during this year’s legislative session. 

HB 1589 allows Puget Sound Energy, the state’s largest utility, to start planning how to move away from natural gas as part of Gov. Jay Inslee’s efforts to fight climate change.

Opponents of I-2066 issued a report from Climate Solutions in late October that found the measure, if passed, could raise consumer utility gas bills in Washington by $150 or more per year by 2035 and double them by 2050.

Climate Solutions’ argument suggested that with gas use already in decline in the state, and more people choosing electric appliances, that leaves fewer gas customers who will have to pay higher monthly energy bills to maintain a gas system.

In response to the opponents’ report, BIAW noted that an Oct. 17 report from the U.S. Energy Information Administration, showed electricity costs more than three times as much as natural gas.

There are currently only seven states plus Washington, D.C. with jurisdictions restricting natural gas use in new construction. Washington state is one of these regions that have restrictions on natural gas. More than half of U.S. states have placed preemptive measures in place prohibiting natural gas bans by local or state jurisdictions.

This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.

---

Also read:

• 
  WAGOP lawsuit disputing State Senate General Election finally heard in court
  A WAGOP lawsuit challenging Clark County’s 2024 election results was heard in court, alleging voter roll inaccuracies affected the Legislative District 18 race.
• 
  WA gubernatorial emergency powers reform legislation dies – again
  Emergency powers reforms have stalled in the previous four legislative sessions Brett DavisThe Center Square Washington The political stars seemed aligned for the Washington State Legislature to pass a bill this session to rein in the governor’s emergency powers, with Republicans eager to pass reform legislation and a new Democratic governor who in his inaugural …
• 
  Opinion: Legislative winners and losers so far
  The Washington Policy Center reviews the legislative session’s winners and losers, highlighting key policy decisions affecting business, taxation, and housing in Washington state.
• 
  Rep. John Ley’s bill to assist the construction industry receives approval from Washington State House of Representatives
  House Bill 1857, introduced by Rep. John Ley, aims to reduce construction costs by exempting certain building materials from asbestos-related restrictions.
• 
  Democrats expected to push tax hikes to fund inequitable pay raises
  Senate Republicans propose the $ave Washington budget, countering Democrats’ push for tax hikes to fund pay raises, citing a more balanced fiscal approach.