Voters reject tax proposals in April 22 special election

Clark County voters rejected all three tax measures on the April 22 special election ballot, including proposals in Camas, Washougal, Battle Ground, and Hockinson.
Clark County voters rejected all three tax measures on the April 22 special election ballot, including proposals in Camas, Washougal, Battle Ground, and Hockinson. File photo

Proposed Regional Fire Authority rejected by Camas and Washougal voters; school levies in Battle Ground and Hockinson also rejected by voters

It appears Clark County voters have rejected all three tax propositions on the April 22 special election ballot, including a proposed Regional Fire Protection Authority in Camas and Washougal and school levy proposals in Battle Ground and Hockinson.

Proposition 1, a proposed Regional Fire Authority for the cities of Camas and Washougal was failing 51.96 percent (4,067 votes) to 48.04 percent (3,760 votes) in the initial results provided Tuesday night by the Clark County Elections Department.

The City Councils of Camas and Washougal adopted a joint resolution approving the Regional Fire Authority Protection Service Plan. The proposition would approve the plan and create an RFA to be known as the Camas-Washougal Fire Authority, effective Sept. 1, 2025, to provide fire protection and emergency medical services in the city of Camas and the city of Washougal. The RFA would be funded by property tax ($1.05 per $1,000 of assessed value).

In the Battle Ground School District, Proposition No. 9 is currently failing with 51.62 percent (10,282 votes) against and 48.38 percent (9,636 votes) for. 

The Educational Programs and Operations Replacement Levy was proposed by the Board of Directors of the Battle Ground School District. The proposition was designed to continue funding student educational programs and operations. The proposition would authorize the district to levy the excess taxes, replacing an expiring levy, on all taxable property within the district for expenses not funded by the state (including student safety, instructional/support staff, small classes, curriculum, nursing, mental health support, special education, busing, sports, and arts. The four-year levy would have had a levy rate of $1.95 per 1,000 of assessed property and would have collected $38,300,000, $40,400,000, $42,600,000, and $44,975,000 in the four years.

In the Hockinson School District, Proposition 10 was failing by the largest margin of the three propositions before voters Tuesday. Just 44.02 percent (1,049 votes) of the voters were in favor of the levy and 55.98 percent) were against the capital levy proposal, which was designed for safety, security and infrastructure improvements. This proposition would have authorized the district to levy taxes, upon all taxable property within the district, to fund secure entries, automatic door locks and emergency communication systems; improve traffic flow and campus security at Hockinson Heights Elementary and upgrade facilities districtwide.

The six-year levy would have had a levy rate beginning at $0.66 per $1,000 of assessed property and increasing to $0.69 per $1,000. The levy amount each year would have been $1,875,000, $1,950,000, $2,050,000, $2,175,000, $2,285,000 and $2,400,000.

For updated election results this week, visit https://clark.wa.gov/elections/results.


Also read:

2 Comments

  1. Randall Schultz-Rathbun

    Washington State is spending almost $19,000 per student this year, up from $16,000 three years ago. In the 2013-2015 budget, the state education budget was $15 billion dollars, this budget cycle it’s $31 billion. Increases in spending have far out-paced inflation, yet test scores remain flat with 50% of Washington students failing to meet grade level in math, and 60% failing to meet grade level in language subjects. Test scores are actually lower now than they were ten years ago. Average teacher salaries in Washington are over $100,000 per year and have generous benefits packages attached. More money won’t fix the problem because money isn’t the problem.

    Reply
    1. Josh

      This isn’t just about test scores. This is about sports, music programs, special needs classes, along with safety and health staff. These require extra money that is not provided by the state. BG spends far less than the state average per student and has test scores above the state average. You are conflating a state issue with a local measure. Justify your anti-education position with whatever makes you feel better about voting against kids and schools.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *