In order to reach the 28 percent tree canopy goal, it would cost the city tens of millions of dollars
Spencer Pauley
The Center Square Washington
An Urban Forestry Management Plan is up for a vote by the Vancouver City Council in November with an ambitious goal of increasing the city’s tree canopy coverage to 28 percent by 2047.
The plan, created in part by software company PlanIT GEO, touts that the city’s current 21 percent tree coverage provides over $40 million in ecological benefits to the city. The city’s current overall budget spends $1.7 billion, not counting supplemental appropriations.
However, in order to reach the 28 percent tree canopy goal, it would cost the city tens of millions of dollars.
The draft plan estimates in one scenario that the city would spend approximately $25 million over 25 years in order to plant 100 percent of the 124,900 trees needed to reach 28 percent tree canopy cover by 2047.
If 100 percent of the trees were planted through city contracts, the cost would amount to $56.2 million through 2047.
These costs are based on regional and industry estimates, which include costs for hole preparation, transportation, unloading, planting time and backfilling. Notably, the estimates are not adjusted for future inflation.
Another scenario in which the city of Vancouver led 60 percent (74,940 trees) of planting costs estimate approximately $15 million needed over the next 25 years in order to reach the Urban Forestry Management Plan’s goal. The annual planting costs would total $599,520.
The remaining 40 percent (49,960) would come from city partners and private-led planting. In order to plant the 49,960 trees, it would cost $17.5 million over 25 years, or $699,440 per year, according to the draft plan.
In this scenario, The draft plan states that it would amount to $1.8 million in maintenance if each tree were maintained annually. Given the goal of a 7-to-10 year proactive maintenance program, 7,494 trees per year amounts to $181,355 annually, according to the draft plan.
Statistics show that there are approximately 99,000 trees currently in maintained areas citywide.
Estimated costs for an “effective pruning program” include hiring six new full-time positions at an annual cost of $553,811; four arborists, two crew supervisors. The plan also includes one seasonal part-time employee. The total cost for a new public tree maintenance team is estimated at $900,621 for the hiring of new positions, as well as the purchases of gear and equipment.
The city already has an above-average tree canopy coverage that provides $44 million in benefits to the city, according to officials.
Breaking down the $44 million value shows Vancouver’s urban forest removed approximately 297,000 pounds of pollutants, a $2 million value, and reduced 243 million gallons of stormwater runoff, saving the city an additional $2 million, according to the plan’s statistics.
The eco-benefits of Vancouver’s current tree canopy also stored 447 million pounds of carbon, which officials estimate is a $38 million value and another 14 million pounds of sequestered carbon, totaling $1 million in value.
Vancouver Urban Forester Charles Ray said in a Planning Commission meeting on Sept. 26 that the $44 million was derived from the best available science from the i-Tree tools that the city utilized in its 2021 Tree Canopy Assessment Report.
The city uses a three-year subscription to PlanIT GEO’s TreePlotter and Canopy software to track tree canopy data. The subscription costs approximately $10,000 per year.
According to data in the plan, the city saw tree canopy coverage go from 3 percent in 2011 to 19 percent in 2019. The most recent dataset from 2021 had the city’s tree coverage at 21 percent.
Vancouver scored an urban forestry audit score of 78 out of 100, which is considered good. Ray noted that most communities score in the 60-70 range.
Vancouver’s urban forestry stems from a mix of revenues. These include the city’s Department of Public Works Stormwater Utility Fund and the city’s Tree Fund, for a total budget of $1 million in 2022, according to the city’s 2022 urban forestry report.
Ray told The Center Square that the average program cost for the planting and maintenance of the city’s urban forest is $667 per tree.
Vancouver planted 1,323 new trees in 2022, which are expected to intercept approximately 1,005,480 gallons of stormwater annually once they mature. They are anticipated to absorb more than 13,230 pounds of pollutants each year from the air we breathe.
“Overall, these 1,323 new trees as they mature will provide greater than $3 million worth of benefits, a 250 percent return on this wise investment,” the city’s 2022 annual report states.
Ray said that the Vancouver community has backed the city’s work to increase the city’s tree canopy coverage.
“We are pleased with the support and participation from the community with the draft plan and our program,” Ray said to The Center Square in an email.
Staff anticipate bringing the final draft Urban Forestry Management Plan forward to the city council on Oct. 23 for a first reading and Nov. 6 for a second reading and public hearing with a recommendation of adoption.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Facing $10B in budget overspending, Washington considers $1.4B state worker pay hikeWashington faces a $10B budget shortfall, considering a $4B worker pay hike.
- 15-year-old earns Eagle Scout after repairing abandoned playgroundTeen Preston Aarhus earns Eagle Scout after revitalizing Vancouver playground.
- POLL: How would you rate the accessibility of Vancouver city officials for addressing community concerns?How accessible are Vancouver city officials to community concerns?
- Budget leader says funding for programs and services is safe, concern is demand for billions in new spendingSen. Lynda Wilson highlights safe funding for services despite looming demands for billions in new spending.
- After evading repeal, will Washington expand its capital gains tax to lower incomes?One member of a prominent Washington think tank suspects lawmakers are considering modifying the capital gains tax to generate more revenue for state coffers Brett DavisThe Center Square Washington A general income tax in Washington state appears to be off the table for now, even as voters retained the state’s capital gains tax by failing …
- Opinion: New audit offers another reason lawmakers should leave the state’s paid-leave program behindElizabeth New (Hovde) critiques Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave program, highlighting audit findings of double-dipping and program inefficiencies.
- Opinion: WA turns redder, despite faulty media reports that said otherwiseWAGOP highlights gains in Washington’s November 2024 election, challenging claims the state turned “bluer.”