Bid for two sewage lift pumps for the Vancouver Marine Park Wastewater Treatment Facility that was 162 percent higher than city estimates
Spencer Pauley
The Center Square Washington
The Vancouver City Council has rejected a bid for two sewage lift pumps for the Vancouver Marine Park Wastewater Treatment Facility that was 162 percent higher than city estimates.
The Vancouver Marine Park Wastewater Treatment Facility is in need of replacements of two replacement non-clog pumps to ensure a safer workplace and more reliable operation. Currently, the facility’s sewage influent pump gallery has two newer non-clog pumps and three pumps from original construction in the 1990’s. Treatment plant operators have to manually remove materials from the three old pumps.
The city engineer originally estimated that the purchase of two non-clog pumps would cost $90,000, rather than the $862,969 bid that the city received. The engineer’s estimate was based on a single, smaller pump and was erroneously not updated when the project turned to pursuing larger pumps, according to a staff report.
The updated estimate from the city engineer is now $560,000, which is a 522% increase from the original estimate.
The Vancouver City Council rejected the bid in the council meeting on Jan. 8 as part of the consent agenda. With the rejected bid, the city staff will now ensure more competitive pricing by establishing more standard requirements and specifications.
Out of the $128 million that is dedicated to utilities projects in the Vancouver 2023-2024 budget, $58 million is set for a two-year wastewater program that includes $7 million in investments for the Marine Park plant where the replacement pumps are intended to go.
The Center Square reached out to the City of Vancouver to inquire if the updated estimated cost of $560,000 to purchase two new pumps impact the city’s intent to ensure a safer workplace at the Marine Park plant. However, the city did not respond at the time of this publication.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- POLL: How would you rate the accessibility of Vancouver city officials for addressing community concerns?
How accessible are Vancouver city officials to community concerns? - Budget leader says funding for programs and services is safe, concern is demand for billions in new spending
Sen. Lynda Wilson highlights safe funding for services despite looming demands for billions in new spending. - After evading repeal, will Washington expand its capital gains tax to lower incomes?One member of a prominent Washington think tank suspects lawmakers are considering modifying the capital gains tax to generate more revenue for state coffers Brett DavisThe Center Square Washington A general income tax in Washington state appears to be off the table for now, even as voters retained the state’s capital gains tax by failing …
- Opinion: New audit offers another reason lawmakers should leave the state’s paid-leave program behindElizabeth New (Hovde) critiques Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave program, highlighting audit findings of double-dipping and program inefficiencies.
- Opinion: WA turns redder, despite faulty media reports that said otherwiseWAGOP highlights gains in Washington’s November 2024 election, challenging claims the state turned “bluer.”
- Vancouver City Council to host community forum on Nov. 25Vancouver City Council invites community members to share questions and ideas at a public forum on Nov. 25 at Evergreen Public Schools.
- Vancouver Public Schools to run Technology, Safety, and Capital Projects Levy on February ballotVancouver Public Schools Board approves a Technology, Safety, and Capital Projects Levy for the February 2025 ballot to support long-term needs.
