
According to the bill’s fiscal note, Washington state could potentially see an increase of unemployment insurance claims ranging from 812 to 3,000 additional claims a year
Spencer Pauley
The Center Square Washington
The Washington state House Appropriations Committee has passed a proposed bill that would allow workers in Washington state to receive unemployment insurance during strikes.
Proposed House Bill 1893 would remove the prohibition against receiving unemployment insurance benefits for workers participating in a strike.
Currently, a worker is disqualified from receiving benefits if he or she is unemployed because of a strike.
If benefits are not charged to any employer, those costs are socialized and shared evenly by all employers participating in the unemployment insurance system.
The current maximum weekly unemployment insurance benefit amount is $1,019, according to HB 1893.
If the bill is signed into law, benefits would be paid out of the unemployment insurance trust fund as opposed to the actual company that the striking employees work for. However, those costs would be shared evenly by all employers participating in the system.
At Monday’s House Appropriations Committee meeting Rep. Timm Ormsby, D-Spokane, said that workers go on strike as “an action of last resort” and that “many of them are in very tentative [and] precarious financial positions when they take this action of last resort.”
Rep Chris Corry, R-Yakima, agreed that there should be a tentative balance between workers and employers, but said that the bill would tip the balance in favor of striking workers.
“It doesn’t take long before this does have an impact not only on the [unemployment insurance trust fund], but on rates paid by employers and employees across the state,” Corry said. “Therefore, we don’t think this is the right policy.”
According to the bill’s fiscal note, Washington state could potentially see an increase of unemployment insurance claims ranging from 812 to 3,000 additional claims a year. This translates into an increase of $9.8 million to $14.1 million in annual payout of benefits that currently sit around $120 million a year.
The note also found that the state denied an average of 2,313 claims per year due to a labor dispute.
According to the Cornell University Labor Action Tracker, thousands of workers went on strike in one of 26 labor actions in Washington in 2023.
The proposed bill is similar to a bill in California that Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoed last October, as previously reported by The Center Square. That bill would have allowed striking workers to collect unemployment benefits, which in California are funded by employers.
Newsom’s reasoning for vetoing the bill was that any expansion of eligibility for unemployment insurance benefits could increase the state’s outstanding federal unemployment insurance debt that was projected to be nearly $20 billion by the end of 2023. It could also jeopardize California’s Benefit Cost Ratio add-on waiver application, significantly increasing taxes on employers.
House Bill 1893 has been referred to the Rules Committee for review.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Opinion: The Clark County Charter grants the power to appoint, not to revoke, council member board appointmentsAttorney Angus Lee argues that the Clark County Council lacks legal authority to remove Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN Board, raising concerns over governance and legal consequences.
- Councilor Michelle Belkot recaps volatile week during appearance on The Lars Larson ShowClark County Councilor Michelle Belkot discusses her removal from the C-TRAN Board and her concerns over light rail funding and the I-5 Bridge project.
- WAGOP lawsuit disputing State Senate General Election finally heard in courtA WAGOP lawsuit challenging Clark County’s 2024 election results was heard in court, alleging voter roll inaccuracies affected the Legislative District 18 race.
- WA gubernatorial emergency powers reform legislation dies – againEmergency powers reforms have stalled in the previous four legislative sessions Brett DavisThe Center Square Washington The political stars seemed aligned for the Washington State Legislature to pass a bill this session to rein in the governor’s emergency powers, with Republicans eager to pass reform legislation and a new Democratic governor who in his inaugural …
- Opinion: Legislative winners and losers so farThe Washington Policy Center reviews the legislative session’s winners and losers, highlighting key policy decisions affecting business, taxation, and housing in Washington state.
- Proposed Regional Fire Authority could burn holes in area residents’ walletsResidents in Camas and Washougal face a key vote on Proposition 1, a new Regional Fire Authority proposal that could significantly increase property taxes while promising improved emergency services.
- Vancouver’s State of the City and Council Community ForumMayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle will deliver the 2025 State of the City address, highlighting progress on community safety, homelessness, affordable housing, and economic opportunity.