Government cannot demonstrate that the shots are safe
Art Moore
WND News Center
Amid the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s slow-rolling of data on the risks of the COVID-19 vaccines, the British government is recommending against pregnant and breastfeeding women receiving the shots.
An update of the U.K. health department’s “Summary of the Public Assessment Report for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech” states that because of the rapid development of the vaccine, that is an “absence of reproductive toxicity data,” the National Pulse reported.
Therefore, “sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time.”
The report’s “Toxicity Conclusions” section says the “absence of reproductive toxicity data is a reflection of the speed of development to first identify and select COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 for clinical testing and its rapid development to meet the ongoing urgent health need.”
“In principle, a decision on Licensing a vaccine could be taken in these circumstances without data from reproductive toxicity studies animals, but there are studies ongoing and these will be provided when available,” the report said.
Pfizer excluded pregnant women from trial
Pfizer COVID vaccine trial documents released by the FDA under court order show the company deliberately excluded pregnant women from the trials. Yet health associations and officials have urged expectant mothers to get the shots anyway, insisting they were safe and effective, according to longtime Democratic consultant and investigative author Naomi Wolf, who has mobilized a team of health experts and attorneys to pore over the documents.
The recommendation of the shots for pregnant women was based on a study in France of 44 rats over a period of 42 days, the documents show.
Wolf points to a spike in severe adverse events among pregnant women that coincided with the vaccine rollout in 2021, as documented in Department of Defense data and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System database run by the FDA and the CDC.
Through a lawsuit, the FDA was forced to release the documents on the Pfizer vaccine trials after pressing to hide the data for 75 years. The findings of Wolf’s team are compiled on the website of her company Daily Clout.
Wolf says the documents show that by August 2021, Pfizer and the FDA knew the vaccines were not safe and effective but rolled them out anyway.
An analysis of the documentation on pregnant women by a female physician, she says, indicate that there were no vaccine trials conducted to determine whether or not the vaccines were safe during pregnancy or breast feeding. All emergency use authorization excluded pregnant women, she notes, and no COVID-19 vaccine has been approved for use during pregnancy. Yet, many health organizations have strongly advocated that pregnant women get the shots.
One released Pfizer document – which lists 21 categories of people who were excluded from the first all phases of the Pfizer human trials – specifically excluded “women who are pregnant and breast feeding.”
In the French rat study, the researchers concluded the vaccine had no adverse effects. However, the limited period of study precluded observation of any long-term impact.
And significantly, Wolf points out, a disclaimer disclosed that the researchers were employed by Pfizer or owned Pfizer or BioNTech stock.
Also read:
- Letter: New movie on COVID vaccine victims deserves a watchRichard Beamish discusses the documentary on COVID vaccine victims, urging viewers to watch.
- Vancouver screening scheduled of ‘Vaxxed III: Authorized to Kill’Vancouver screening of ‘Vaxxed III: Authorized to Kill’ scheduled for Sept. 18 at Vancouver Mall 23.
- Study: Risk for getting COVID rises with each shotA new report from the Epoch Times warns that the more COVID shots an individual has taken, the higher the risk of getting COVID.
- ‘That’s a scandal’: CDC knew COVID shots caused deaths, but lied with public denialsA new report from the Epoch Times reveals its investigation shows that the CDC knew of the links between the COVID shots and death – and lied about them.
- FDA agrees to remove anti-ivermectin posts off the internet in lawsuit settlementThe Food and Drug Administration has reportedly settled a lawsuit brought by three doctors who accused the health regulator of interfering with their ability to practice medicine and prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID.
- No good news about student learning on 4-year anniversary of COVID school closuresFour years ago this month, schools nationwide shut down as COVID-19 numbers skyrocketed and students were sent home for what was initially planned to be two weeks.
- NBA Hall-of-Famer among plaintiffs in lawsuit over WA state COVID-19 restrictionsNBA Hall-of-Famer John Stockton of Spokane is among the plaintiffs suing over alleged free-speech sanctions levied against health care providers who spoke out against state restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Opinion: Gov. Inslee wants to be remembered for COVID-19 response?Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center doesn’t think Gov. Jay Inslee should remind people of his legacy COVID response.