Researchers examine data from one of world’s most vaccinated nations
Art Moore
WND News Center
A study based on weekly government data in New Zealand – one of the world’s most vaccinated nations – found that the age groups most likely to have had COVID booster shots had up to 10% more excess deaths.
Excess mortality is the number of deaths from all causes above what would be typically expected in one year.
Authored by John Gibson, an economics professor at the University of Waikato in Hamilton, New Zealand, the study found there were 16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses in the country, amounting to more than 400 excess deaths, reported the website The Expose.
Gibson said that if extrapolated, it amounted to 300,000 excess deaths worldwide.
In his paper, “The Rollout of COVID-19 Booster Vaccines is Associated with Rising Excess Mortality in New Zealand,” the economist said the bottom line from his study is that the risks of the COVID vaccines outweigh any benefits.
“The ratio of vaccine risk to benefits likely has swung more towards risk than during the original randomised trials, due to dose-dependent adverse events and to fixation of immune responses on a variant no longer circulating,” he wrote.
The study found that the age groups “most likely to use boosters had 7-10 percentage point rises in excess mortality rates as boosters were rolled out while the age group that is mostly too young for boosters saw no rise in excess mortality.”
The Expose noted that last December, New Zealand’s COVID Response minister, Chris Hipkins, reduced the interval between the second dose and the booster shot from six months to four months. That made 82% of vaccinated New Zealanders eligible for a booster by late February 2022.
A graph from Gibson’s analysis shows a sustained rise in excess mortality coinciding with the booster rollout.
The increase in excess mortality over the past four months, the study found, was experienced by all ages except the 0-29 years group, who were mostly ineligible for boosters.
Gibson concluded the “age groups most likely to use boosters had 7–10 percentage point rises in excess mortality rates as boosters were rolled out while the age group that is mostly too young for boosters saw no rise in excess mortality.”
Also read:
- Opinion: Why Bob Ferguson is wrong and what SMF is doing about it
Silent Majority Foundation challenges Bob Ferguson over alleged rights violations in federal lawsuit. - Silent Majority Foundation files lawsuit on behalf of former state employees who were terminated under policy requiring a COVID-19 vaccineSilent Majority Foundation files a lawsuit on behalf of former state employees alleging constitutional violations over a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
- Letter: New movie on COVID vaccine victims deserves a watchRichard Beamish discusses the documentary on COVID vaccine victims, urging viewers to watch.
- Vancouver screening scheduled of ‘Vaxxed III: Authorized to Kill’Vancouver screening of ‘Vaxxed III: Authorized to Kill’ scheduled for Sept. 18 at Vancouver Mall 23.
- Study: Risk for getting COVID rises with each shot
A new report from the Epoch Times warns that the more COVID shots an individual has taken, the higher the risk of getting COVID. - ‘That’s a scandal’: CDC knew COVID shots caused deaths, but lied with public denialsA new report from the Epoch Times reveals its investigation shows that the CDC knew of the links between the COVID shots and death – and lied about them.
- FDA agrees to remove anti-ivermectin posts off the internet in lawsuit settlementThe Food and Drug Administration has reportedly settled a lawsuit brought by three doctors who accused the health regulator of interfering with their ability to practice medicine and prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID.
- No good news about student learning on 4-year anniversary of COVID school closuresFour years ago this month, schools nationwide shut down as COVID-19 numbers skyrocketed and students were sent home for what was initially planned to be two weeks.
Facts, at long last! The truth was hidden under rotten lies and subterfuge by many authorities and MSM.
From a scientific viewpoint these findings are not at all surprising, since no valid data is as yet available as to:
The laboratory-made jabs enter the cytoplasm and take ribosome to form the S1 protein, ie the so-called ‘spike’. Simply put: the jabs turn our body into an artificial spike-making machine. This is not what previous (real) vaccines do. Therefore, the jabs are a form of gene therapy rather than a vaccine. Were we informed? No, of. course not.
It is also a fact that adverse events and deaths have occurred, and will continue to occur post-jabs. Perhaps this article will prompt people to be more open minded and do their own research. After all, it is your body that is being used as an experimental object. Do you really consent? Regret always comes after the damage is done, often irreversible.
If these jabs were truly ‘safe and effective’ there would have been no need for mandates or lies. People would line up to get them. Demand determines supply. Increasingly, many millions of surplus jabs are being wasted – people are more aware of the facts and refuse to have them.
Vaccine makers are 100% exempt from any and all liability in US. Unbelievable but true. Remember that!
A “spike” in excess deaths that matches the spike in Covid deaths. It must be the booster rather than what it really is.
For young people, who are HIGHLY UNLIKELY to die from SARS-CoV2, why would they need to have this mRNA vaccine that tells their bodies to create the SPIKE protein?! Our human immune systems are extremely well constructed to handle this pathogen, and kids’ immune systems are stronger than older individuals. Let’s let them build up their own resistance!!!
Nowhere in this article does it prove that vaccines made the mortality go up. It just says the age group most likely to get a booster. Gee, wouldn’t that age group (which is older people) be more likely to have higher deaths than the 0-29 age group anyway even if covid or covid vaccines did not exist? this is a weird article.
Did you read Sylvia’s comment? There is nothing ‘weird’ about the article. It is numbers, facts, data.. something the pro-vaccine not a vaccine but an experiment group keep saying they want. There it is.