![Citizens and a conservative think tank have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review Washington State's controversial capital gains tax, arguing its constitutionality and potential for broader taxation changes.](https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Large_Clark-County-Today-SCOTUS-review-sought-for-Washington-states-controversial-capital-gains-tax.jpg)
The petition was submitted Monday by the Olympia-based Freedom Foundation on behalf of nine individual plaintiffs
Randy Bracht
The Center Square Washington
A group of citizens and a conservative think tank have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Washington State Supreme Court’s ruling on a controversial capital gains tax.
The petition was submitted Monday by the Olympia-based Freedom Foundation on behalf of nine individual plaintiffs. Named as respondents were the State of Washington, the state Department of Revenue, and Revenue director Vikki Smith.
The petitioners are asking the high court to consider the constitutionality of the tax, which they consider to be illegal.
It was enacted in 2021 by a narrow majority in Washington’s Democratic-majority Legislature and supported by Gov. Jay Inslee.
The petitioners say Washington’s state constitution mandates that all taxes on “property,” including income, must be uniform and capped at 1%.
To get around that limit, petitioners allege, proponents of the new law labeled it an “excise tax” – not an income tax – that places a 7% tax on long-term capital gains while exempting the initial $250,000 per year.
“… while that may have solved a state-law problem, it created a federal-law problem,” the petition states, noting that many securities transactions occur outside of Washington’s borders. That raises the question: does the U.S. Constitution permit a state to tax out-of-state transactions involving only out-of-state property?
The petition seeks a writ of certiorari, or judicial review of a lower court’s ruling. If the U.S. Supreme Court accepts the case, it will be reviewing the Washington State Supreme Court’s 7-2 decision in March that found the tax to be an excise tax, not an income tax.
Washington is one of nine states without an income tax, which places a heavy reliance on sales and fuel taxes to meet public expenses. Consequently, lower-income persons are disproportionally burdened compared to wealthy individuals, say supporters of the capital gains tax, which applies to only an estimated 7,000 state residents.
Forty-one other states tax capital gains as income, not as an excise tax, which is considered more broadly as a levy on certain goods, services, or activities.
Washington voters have rejected numerous prior attempts to amend the state constitution to impose income taxes.
Following its enactment in 2021, the new law was challenged by wealthy individuals, business and agricultural interests who claimed it violated state and federal constitutions. That view was supported last year by Douglas County Superior Court Judge Brian Huber, who ruled that the measure was in fact an income tax.
Huber’s ruling in the lawsuit, Quinn v. State, was appealed to the state Supreme Court by Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson, a Democrat.
In its appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, the Freedom Foundation contends the capital gains tax violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which reserves to Congress – not individual states – the right to regulate interstate commerce.
While conceding that Washington’s law only affects a relatively small number of state residents, critics of the capital gains tax fear it could open the door to a graduated income tax.
“Washington’s liberals in every branch of government have long lamented the absence of an income tax in the state and sought ways to generate additional revenue by taxing high earners at a higher rate than those earning less,” the foundation said in a news release Monday.
“The framers of the Washington State Constitution recognized that earning should be encouraged, not punished, because economic success benefits everyone,” said Eric Stahlfeld, Freedom Foundation chief litigation counsel. “And more than 100 years of court precedent have supported that view.
“Had this case been heard by a federal court instead of state court, it would already have been thrown out,” Stahlfeld contended.
The listed petitioners are Chris Quinn, Craig Leuthold, Suzie Burke, Lewis Randall, Rick Glenn, Neil Muller, Larry and Margaret King and Kerry Cox.
The U.S. Supreme Court is under no obligation to grant a writ of certiorari, and usually only opts to hear cases of national significance. Four of the nine justices must agree to accept a case, and the court accepts 100 to 150 cases from more than 7,000 cases it asked to consider to review each year. The court begins its annual session on the first Monday in October.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Harvest Days in Battle Ground coming up July 19-21The Battle Ground Festivals Association is preparing for three days of celebration, including a car cruise on Friday night, a parade on Saturday, and fireworks on Saturday night at Harvest Days.
- Organizers looking for cars for Cruise to the Shoug show on Aug. 454-40 Brewing Co. is hosting Cruise to the Shoug on Aug. 4 as a fundraiser for the Camas-Washougal Community Chest, and organizers are looking for car owners to book their spots for the show.
- Trump picks Ohio’s J.D. Vance for vice presidentFormer President Donald Trump picked U.S. Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, to serve as his vice president should Trump beat President Joe Biden this November for another term in the White House.
- Children with disabilities make memories at the 24th annual Merwin Day of FishingOn Saturday (July 13), Pacific Power and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife joined together to host a memorable fishing event for children with disabilities at the Merwin Fish Hatchery near Woodland.
- Letter: For the public record and the Comprehensive PlanIn a July 12 letter to the Clark County Council, Clark County Citizens United President Susan Rasmussen shares that primary stakeholders were ignored in the Wetland and Habitat Ordinance Conservation Covenant.
- CASE DISMISSED: Classified documents case against Trump thrown out by judgeA federal judge in Florida dismissed the classified documents-related criminal case against former President Donald Trump on Monday, saying the appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith violated the Constitution.
- Photos: Log show and parade at Territorial Days 2024 in AmboyTerritorial Days in Amboy never disappoints, and this weekend brought all kinds of activities in logging country, and Clark County Today had a photographer there to capture images from the annual parade and log show.