Communications between the residents and the hotline may also reveal crimes committed by, or against, the person in question
TJ Martinell
The Center Square Washington
Recently the Washington Attorney General’s Office launched a 24/7 confidential youth reporting system that allows residents up to 25 years old to contact them regarding a variety of issues, including mental health and physical safety. However, communications between the residents and the hotline may also reveal crimes committed by, or against, the person in question.
While the AGO has developed procedures for when to contact law enforcement, some concerns have been raised as to how the program’s stated purpose and best practices might lead to conflicting priorities.
According to HearMeWa’s Best Practices Toolkit, the intent of the hotline is “to provide a place of support and early intervention for youth who may have concerns about themselves or others. The referral and response framework aims to defer youth from the criminal justice system and into systems of support that are inclusive and respectful of all youths’ needs.”
While youth surveyed for the program identified issues such as social pressures, cyberbullying, and mental well-being that could be helped via a hotline, they also cited sexual abuse/assault and abuse/neglect as other needs the program could address. For example, one youth surveyed noted that they needed help “when I was in an abusive relationship at the age of 17, with a much older person.”
Further, youth surveyed made recommendations for the program that emphasized confidentiality and not involving the police “when not necessary.” One youth who participated in an online survey conducted for the program wrote “Please no police. Having the police leads to LGBTQ+, BIPOC, and other marginalized communities to use these resources less, and they might need it the most.”
According to the best practices toolkit, “the AGO expects tip responder agencies will follow youth’s recommendations when practicable within their agency or organization’s existing policies and procedures, always prioritizing the safety and well-being of those contacting the program.”
Allowing the AGO to accept reports of criminal activity as part of the program has proved controversial. The concept of the hotline was first introduced via Senate Bill 5835 during the 2019. Last year, the concept was again reconsidered under Senate Bill 5327. Neither bill cleared the Legislature, but Senate Bill 5327’s language was inserted in the operating budget as a $2.5 million funding proviso.
Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs Executive Director Steve Strachan wrote in a statement to The Center Square that “WASPC believes every effort should be made to support the provision of services to those who need services, particularly victims of crime.
“However, reports of criminal activity should be made to law enforcement, not the Attorney General’s Office. To our knowledge, this [HearMeWa] program was never intended to defer youth from the criminal justice system, serve as an alternative to the criminal justice system, or to not involve the police. We have every confidence that the Attorney General will alert law enforcement immediately when immediate emergency response to a tip is warranted, and refer and follow up with law enforcement – just as the law requires.”
When The Center Square reached out to the AGO for comment, Communications Manager Brionna Aho wrote that under the program “all reports of imminent threats, actions in progress and/or that require immediate intervention should be sent to 911, and secondary resources as appropriate.”
Examples of that include:
- Actions, past, present and future that can put someone in danger
- When the person is reporting a missing person or a runaway child, or a matter that requires more in-depth investigation due to potential criminal activity.
- When the person is reporting an ongoing crime and call center staff has enough evidence to believe that a dispatch team is required.
Examples of when they do not contact law enforcement are calls/tips regarding anxiety, bullying, depression, hazing, homelessness, and substance abuse.
“Our program has clear guidance for our contractor, which was created in consultation with our law enforcement partners and the advisory group,” Aho wrote.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- POLL: How would you rate the accessibility of Vancouver city officials for addressing community concerns?How accessible are Vancouver city officials to community concerns?
- Budget leader says funding for programs and services is safe, concern is demand for billions in new spendingSen. Lynda Wilson highlights safe funding for services despite looming demands for billions in new spending.
- After evading repeal, will Washington expand its capital gains tax to lower incomes?One member of a prominent Washington think tank suspects lawmakers are considering modifying the capital gains tax to generate more revenue for state coffers Brett DavisThe Center Square Washington A general income tax in Washington state appears to be off the table for now, even as voters retained the state’s capital gains tax by failing …
- Opinion: New audit offers another reason lawmakers should leave the state’s paid-leave program behindElizabeth New (Hovde) critiques Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave program, highlighting audit findings of double-dipping and program inefficiencies.
- Opinion: WA turns redder, despite faulty media reports that said otherwiseWAGOP highlights gains in Washington’s November 2024 election, challenging claims the state turned “bluer.”
- Vancouver City Council to host community forum on Nov. 25Vancouver City Council invites community members to share questions and ideas at a public forum on Nov. 25 at Evergreen Public Schools.
- Vancouver Public Schools to run Technology, Safety, and Capital Projects Levy on February ballotVancouver Public Schools Board approves a Technology, Safety, and Capital Projects Levy for the February 2025 ballot to support long-term needs.