![David Boze of the Washington Policy Center shares an editorial from the Wall Street Journal that provides a ‘scathing analysis’ of Washington’s income tax on capital gains](https://www.clarkcountytoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Large_Clark-County-Today-Case-builds-for-WAs-‘Two-Faced-Tax-to-be-decided-by-SCOTUS.jpg)
David Boze of the Washington Policy Center shares an editorial from the Wall Street Journal that provides a ‘scathing analysis’ of Washington’s income tax on capital gains
David Boze
Washington Policy Center
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board published a scathing analysis of Washington state’s income tax on capital gains (which, through some linguistic ideological twisting, our State Supreme Court opted to call our “excise tax on capital gains”).
They allude to the fact the tax is tied to income but masquerades as a transactional tax because a progressive tax on income would violate the Washington State Constitution, then dig into where the hubris of its creators created a problem for themselves — they tax “transactions” out of state in violation of the Commerce Clause.
The Journal makes short work of the tax’s defenders argument that it is the same as an internet tax and concludes with a warning about the tax both constitutional and practical while quoting WPC’s amicus brief:
This should be enough to sink the tax at the Supreme Court, but also don’t overlook its practical problems. Allowing interstate excise taxes “threatens to wreak havoc on taxpayers and businesses around the country,” as the Washington Policy Center put it in an amicus brief filed Monday. Washington residents already have a headache in figuring out which sales trigger the tax.
Read the full Wall Street Journal editorial here (warning: WSJ has a paywall). If you hit the paywall problem, MSN has reprinted it here.
David Boze is the communications director at the Washington Policy Center.
Also read:
- Letter: For the public record and the Comprehensive PlanIn a July 12 letter to the Clark County Council, Clark County Citizens United President Susan Rasmussen shares that primary stakeholders were ignored in the Wetland and Habitat Ordinance Conservation Covenant.
- Opinion: Supreme Court gives Vancouver a new tool to use in its homelessness efforts, but will the city use it?Most Vancouver residents do not want homelessness to be criminalized but they do want a response when some in the homeless community commit crimes, and a new ruling by the United States Supreme court is a tool the city could use to help neighborhoods.
- Opinion: Has transit entered the “death spiral?”Transit ridership dropped sharply with the onset of the COVID pandemic in 2020. The slow rebound in the years that followed has prompted discussion, sometimes in hushed tones, as to whether transit had entered a “death spiral.”
- POLL: Should the city of Vancouver do more to protect citizens who have been victims of harassment, or worse, from those living homeless on the streets?Should the city of Vancouver do more to protect citizens who have been victims of harassment, or worse, from those living homeless on the streets?
- Opinion: How bad is freeway speeding?Target Zero Manager Doug Dahl answers a question about the commonplace of freeway speeding in Washington state.