
Vancouver resident Kris Greene continues his conversation with League of Women Voters of Clark County officials over their recent decision regarding a candidate’s participation in a forum
I appreciate the League of Women Voters of Clark County responding to my concerns, but their explanation leaves me deeply unsatisfied. Their claim that they “cannot and will not do anything that advances one candidate over another” is problematic.
A candidate forum’s purpose is to provide voters with a platform to learn about the candidates and their positions. If an incumbent drops out citing a work conflict, it is not the League’s responsibility to enable this evasion of public scrutiny. This move effectively sabotages the democratic process, leaving only one candidate to present their views unchallenged.
The League’s definition of a forum should prioritize transparency and the voters’ right to make informed decisions. Allowing a candidate to back out due to vague conflicts undermines this ideal. Voters deserve more than empty seats and unanswered questions.
In the interest of fair elections, the League should reconsider their stance. If a candidate is scared to answer questions or face their opponent, it raises serious doubts about their suitability for office. Voters have the right to see how candidates handle the spotlight and respond to public scrutiny.
Kris Greene
Vancouver
Also read:
- Opinion: Changes made — and not made — to WA Cares in 2025Elizabeth New (Hovde) outlines 2025 changes to WA Cares, including new automatic exemptions and eligibility tweaks. She also warns that exemption rules could shift, potentially forcing some private insurance holders back into the program.
- Letter: Can the president direct the U. S. Military to strike another country?Vancouver resident Jim McConnell questions the Constitutionality of presidential military actions without Congressional approval, citing historical precedents and legal opinions in response to President Trump’s 2025 strike on Iran.
- Letter: Social Security applauds passage of legislation providing historic tax relief for seniorsAnna Miller shares a letter celebrating new legislation that eliminates federal income taxes on Social Security benefits for nearly 90% of recipients. The bill also enhances deductions for seniors, fulfilling a key promise on retirement protection.
- POLL: What’s the biggest concern you have with the current I-5 Bridge replacement plan?As costs rise and Oregon’s funding fails, concerns mount over the current I-5 Bridge replacement plan. Clark County Today asks readers: what’s your biggest concern?
- Opinion: Your cost of living is about to go up as the majority party’s new taxes and fees kick inRep. John Ley shares a legislative update on rising costs across Washington, including gas taxes, childcare, housing, and business impacts. He highlights concerns about state spending and new transportation policies.