Vancouver resident Kris Greene continues his conversation with League of Women Voters of Clark County officials over their recent decision regarding a candidate’s participation in a forum

I appreciate the League of Women Voters of Clark County responding to my concerns, but their explanation leaves me deeply unsatisfied. Their claim that they “cannot and will not do anything that advances one candidate over another” is problematic.

A candidate forum’s purpose is to provide voters with a platform to learn about the candidates and their positions. If an incumbent drops out citing a work conflict, it is not the League’s responsibility to enable this evasion of public scrutiny. This move effectively sabotages the democratic process, leaving only one candidate to present their views unchallenged.

The League’s definition of a forum should prioritize transparency and the voters’ right to make informed decisions. Allowing a candidate to back out due to vague conflicts undermines this ideal. Voters deserve more than empty seats and unanswered questions.

In the interest of fair elections, the League should reconsider their stance. If a candidate is scared to answer questions or face their opponent, it raises serious doubts about their suitability for office. Voters have the right to see how candidates handle the spotlight and respond to public scrutiny.

Kris Greene
Vancouver

---

Also read:

• 
  Opinion: As voters reject repeal of climate law, CO2 tax price nearly doubles
  CO2 tax in Washington may nearly double after voters reject I-2117, impacting gas prices.
• 
  Opinion: Participation in WA Cares will continue to be mandatory
  WA Cares remains mandatory after voters rejected Initiative 2124, says Elizabeth New Hovde of the Washington Policy Center, with potential future payroll tax increases on the horizon.
• 
  Letter: ‘I would advise that our energies now go into making sure cameras are added to the ballot boxes’
  Vancouver’s Ann Donnelly calls for increased ballot box security, urging officials to install surveillance cameras and seek answers in the ballot box attack investigation.
• 
  Letter: Funds for ballot box surveillance were not requested by Auditor Kimsey
  Clark County Councilor Karen Dill Bowerman disputes Auditor Kimsey’s claim of requesting ballot box surveillance funds in prior council meetings.
• 
  Opinion: It can happen here too – California citizens reject Rent Control
  California rejects rent control with Proposition 33, sending a message about housing affordability and regulation.