The payroll tax is currently equal to $58 annually for every $10,000 in pay; it supports a government-run program called WA Cares, created by majority Democrats in 2019
Several of Washington’s Senate Republicans say the next time legislators are in session, they’ll try again to give workers an opportunity to opt out of the mandatory long-term care tax that began cutting into paychecks July 1.

“Workers around our state are looking at their pay stubs and saying ‘I didn’t ask for this new tax. How can I get out of it? Republicans think they should have that choice, with no strings attached,” said Senate Republican Leader John Braun.
The payroll tax is currently equal to $58 annually for every $10,000 in pay. It supports a government-run program called WA Cares, created by majority Democrats in 2019. The program offers a lifetime payout of no more than $36,500, subject to inflation, regardless of how long a worker pays into it – and in many cases, the benefits would be even less.
Late in 2021, with the unpopular tax set for collection starting in 2022, workers were given a window of time to seek an exemption from it, but only if they purchased their own long-term care coverage and provided proof to the state. The resulting controversy led Democratic legislators to delay the collection of the tax until mid-2023 and add four specific exemptions that are ongoing but still exclude most Washington workers.
While the details are still being ironed out, Braun said the policy Republicans will propose would allow workers to permanently opt out of participation in WA Cares, upon request. There would be no need for proof of other long-term coverage, and depending on when someone opts out, a refund of taxes he or she paid in may be available.
The idea of giving workers a choice about participating in the long-term care program has already gained support from other members of the Senate Republican Caucus.
“Young people who are just entering the workforce didn’t have the choice to opt out before. They deserve it now,” said Sen. Curtis King of Yakima, who is Republican leader on the Senate Labor and Commerce Committee. “People who move into our state and already have long-term care coverage also deserve a choice; they shouldn’t have to be in the position of making a second payment for the state-run program, which is probably not as good as what they already own.
“Then there are the people who never had to consider whether to seek an exemption year before last because they had already retired — but are now returning to the workforce because they need extra income to survive. Why should they be forced to pay into this? They have every reason to be aggravated.”
“Before the 2022 session began we heard Democrats talk about making reforms to this program. They spoke of the need to ‘ensure fairness’ and ‘do it well.’ Here we are, 18 months later, and they haven’t accomplished either,” said Sen. Chris Gildon of Puyallup, who is assistant operating-budget leader.

“The Democrats have twice rejected our proposals to repeal this program, so if we’re stuck with WA Cares, let’s at least try to make it work for the people of Washington by giving them the choice whether to leave or stay. If the coverage being offered is really superior to anything out there in the private market, the majority should have no fear that more workers would think about withdrawing – right?”
“Most Republicans voted last year for the bill that delayed the payroll tax collection until after our 2023 legislative session. I did so in part because the longer delay allowed more time to consider adjustments that might deal with the flaws in this program – one of the biggest of which is the lack of portability,” said Sen. Lynda Wilson, Republican leader on the Senate Ways and Means Committee.
“But the Democrats did nothing this year to make the program more appealing, so all the delay did was push the collection of an unpopular tax past the 2022 general election. To me, the answer is to make this tax voluntary. If workers see value in this program, they can decide to participate. But it needs to be their choice.”
Also read:
- Opinion: The Clark County Charter grants the power to appoint, not to revoke, council member board appointmentsAttorney Angus Lee argues that the Clark County Council lacks legal authority to remove Michelle Belkot from the C-TRAN Board, raising concerns over governance and legal consequences.
- Councilor Michelle Belkot recaps volatile week during appearance on The Lars Larson ShowClark County Councilor Michelle Belkot discusses her removal from the C-TRAN Board and her concerns over light rail funding and the I-5 Bridge project.
- WAGOP lawsuit disputing State Senate General Election finally heard in courtA WAGOP lawsuit challenging Clark County’s 2024 election results was heard in court, alleging voter roll inaccuracies affected the Legislative District 18 race.
- WA gubernatorial emergency powers reform legislation dies – againEmergency powers reforms have stalled in the previous four legislative sessions Brett DavisThe Center Square Washington The political stars seemed aligned for the Washington State Legislature to pass a bill this session to rein in the governor’s emergency powers, with Republicans eager to pass reform legislation and a new Democratic governor who in his inaugural …
- Opinion: Legislative winners and losers so farThe Washington Policy Center reviews the legislative session’s winners and losers, highlighting key policy decisions affecting business, taxation, and housing in Washington state.
- Proposed Regional Fire Authority could burn holes in area residents’ walletsResidents in Camas and Washougal face a key vote on Proposition 1, a new Regional Fire Authority proposal that could significantly increase property taxes while promising improved emergency services.
- Vancouver’s State of the City and Council Community ForumMayor Anne McEnerny-Ogle will deliver the 2025 State of the City address, highlighting progress on community safety, homelessness, affordable housing, and economic opportunity.