‘We wanted to criticize authoritarian governments, but had no idea our own college would stop us’
Bob Unruh
WND News Center
An organization that started out protecting individual rights in America’s academic world, and now has expanded to call itself the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, still is working on college misbehavior.
The organization has announced a victory in its fight with a California college.
There, Clovis Community College had imposed an unconstitutional speech code “that resulted in the suppression of conservative students’ viewpoints.”
And that was struck down by a federal judge, the FIRE reported.
A judge ruled for three students from a chapter of Young Americans for Freedom who wanted to criticize authoritarianism on campus.
They did this by putting up posters listing the death tolls from communist regimes, which the school ordered taken down.
Judge Jennifer Thurston said, however, that the First Amendment doesn’t allow administrators to regulate the content of student speech by claiming that once students post a flyer, it suddenly “becomes” the college’s speech.
The court warned “a government entity cannot avoid constitutional requirements merely by declaring it can do so.”
“The court told Clovis what we’ve been telling them all along: You can’t censor students just because you don’t like their message,” said FIRE attorney Jeff Zeman. “The fight isn’t over. We’ve defeated this unconstitutional policy, but we won’t stop until Clovis treats all student speech equally.”
The court order instructed the college to drop its speech code.
“We wanted to criticize authoritarian governments, but we had no idea that our own college would try to stop us,” said YAF-Clovis founder Alejandro Flores. “I’m glad we fought back, because all students should be able to speak out at college.”
The fight came out of plans by Flores and club members Daniel Florses and Juliette Colunga. They got permission to hang three flyers on bulletin boards, citing those death tolls.
Explained the FIRE: “Emails obtained via a public records request reveal that soon after the flyers went up, a Clovis administrator wrote that he would ‘gladly’ take the flyers down, following complaints about their content. The administrator also wrote that approving the flyers in the first place may have been a ‘mistake,’ and that Clovis instead should have censored them under a policy that states: ‘Posters with inappropriate or offense [sic] language or themes are not permitted and will not be approved.'”
Lori Bennett, Clovis president, then ordered them removed, and invented “a brand new rule” that insists flyers double as club announcements.
“If you need a reason, you can let them know that [we] agreed they aren’t club announcements,” Bennett wrote to Clovis staff.
Only Clovis does not have a policy on the books that requires flyers to be club announcements, the FIRE said.
The school used the same pretext in banning pro-life flyers, too.
The organization said, “Public colleges like Clovis are bound by the First Amendment, and it is unconstitutional to treat student groups differently based on their viewpoints. Clovis’ vague policy banning ‘inappropriate’ or ‘offense [sic]’ themes — terms that could apply to just about anything — puts protected expression in jeopardy by allowing administrators to arbitrarily decide which opinions are inappropriate or offensive and which deserve to be heard.”
FIRE took to the courts last month, seeking to not just end the censorship but hold college officials accountable.
Also read:
- POLL: How would you rate the accessibility of Vancouver city officials for addressing community concerns?How accessible are Vancouver city officials to community concerns?
- Budget leader says funding for programs and services is safe, concern is demand for billions in new spendingSen. Lynda Wilson highlights safe funding for services despite looming demands for billions in new spending.
- After evading repeal, will Washington expand its capital gains tax to lower incomes?One member of a prominent Washington think tank suspects lawmakers are considering modifying the capital gains tax to generate more revenue for state coffers Brett DavisThe Center Square Washington A general income tax in Washington state appears to be off the table for now, even as voters retained the state’s capital gains tax by failing …
- Opinion: New audit offers another reason lawmakers should leave the state’s paid-leave program behindElizabeth New (Hovde) critiques Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Leave program, highlighting audit findings of double-dipping and program inefficiencies.
- Opinion: WA turns redder, despite faulty media reports that said otherwiseWAGOP highlights gains in Washington’s November 2024 election, challenging claims the state turned “bluer.”
- Vancouver City Council to host community forum on Nov. 25Vancouver City Council invites community members to share questions and ideas at a public forum on Nov. 25 at Evergreen Public Schools.
- Vancouver Public Schools to run Technology, Safety, and Capital Projects Levy on February ballotVancouver Public Schools Board approves a Technology, Safety, and Capital Projects Levy for the February 2025 ballot to support long-term needs.