Approved raft of provisions aimed at overturning penalties
Micaela Burrow
Daily Caller News Foundation
• The House Armed Services Committee voted in favor of several amendments aimed at minimizing penalties for and reinstating troops who refused the COVID-19 vaccine.
• Congress repealed the mandate last year, but failed to reinstate service members who faced forced separation.
• “This provides a fair, equitable, and honorable option for our wrongly separated service members,” Republican Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana said during floor debate.
The House Armed Services Committee approved a raft of provisions aimed at overturning penalties for service members who refused the COVID-19 vaccine and bringing those who were discharged back into active duty on Wednesday.
While the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act (DNAA) repealed Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for troops, it opened up a host of complications for members awaiting exemptions or discharges who had negative marks entered into their personnel records and did nothing to reinstate those already discharged. The House Armed Services Committee, debating its markup of the NDAA for fiscal year 2024, took an initial stab at addressing those problems following a year of confusion and GOP dissatisfaction with the Pentagon over how it handled the vaccine repeal.
One amendment, introduced by Rep. Jim Banks of Indiana, who chairs the Military Personnel subcommittee, prevents the Department of Defense (DOD) from adding adverse actions to a service member’s personnel record solely on the basis of refusing the COVID-19 vaccine. Top officials from each of the services previously told Congress no service member would be punished just for refusing the vaccine, but “aggravating factors” could lead to adverse marks permanently entered in their files.
The bill also asks the secretary to reinstate willing members with no changes to their rank or pay grade, rather than requiring them to reenlist and work their way back up to the position they held at time of separation.
“This provides a fair, equitable, and honorable option for our wrongly separated service members — many who filed legitimate religious exemptions and were ignored — to return to the ranks without any detriments to their career progression,” Banks said.
Providing incentives to reentry for service members who otherwise would have remained could help alleviate a worsening recruiting crunch, Banks argued.
The Pentagon booted 8,400 troops from service for refusing the vaccine.
Most servicemembers — roughly 70% — who found themselves involuntarily separated from the military solely for refusing the vaccine received a “general” discharge rather than “honorable,” Military Times reported. Soldiers, sailors and airmen who have already been discharged have the opportunity to petition their service branch to change the characterization of their discharge to honorable, according to guidance issued by each service.
Another Banks resolution calls on the DOD appeals board to prioritize reviewing and correcting the records for discharged service members above other corrections requests. That could allow the members to secure certain veterans’ benefits, such as the GI bill, only available to those receiving honorable discharges, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs.
“Prioritizing those who want to rejoin will help alleviate some of the recruiting crisis we are now in — not, incidentally, caused by dismissing thousands of our troops for failure to get vaccinated,” Banks said.
A third amendment requires DOD to individually contact each servicemember who was discharged and explain the process of re-joining the military no later than six months after the bill is passed into law — which will not be for months.
Republican Rep. Ronny Jackson of Texas spearheaded a provision blocking the military service academies from charging a cadet or midshipman full tuition if they graduated but were prevented from commissioning as officers due to spurning the vaccine order.
But, the committee stopped short of fully mandating reinstatement and backpay for service members who refused the vaccine, something lawmakers, experts and military members have advocated for.
Florida Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz succeeded in passing an amendment that commissions a report from DOD on the “the cost and effort needed to re-recruit, reinstate, offer backpay, and $15,000 bonuses for service members discharged for refusal to take the coronavirus vaccine,” according to the bill.
At least one Democrat voted in favor of each amendment, according to Connor O’Brien of Politico.
Committee ranking member Democratic Rep. Adam Smith of Washington had argued strongly against each amendment on the House floor on the basis that service members who refused the vaccine chose to disobey a lawful order and thus accepted any consequences resulting from that decision.
“Within the military, orders should not be viewed as optional,” Smith said. “For this committee to come back afterward and tell service members that they have the option basically of whether or not to obey the orders of their commanders, I think is a really dangerous precedent.”
This story originally was published by the Daily Caller News Foundation.
Also read:
- Letter: New movie on COVID vaccine victims deserves a watchRichard Beamish discusses the documentary on COVID vaccine victims, urging viewers to watch.
- Vancouver screening scheduled of ‘Vaxxed III: Authorized to Kill’Vancouver screening of ‘Vaxxed III: Authorized to Kill’ scheduled for Sept. 18 at Vancouver Mall 23.
- Study: Risk for getting COVID rises with each shotA new report from the Epoch Times warns that the more COVID shots an individual has taken, the higher the risk of getting COVID.
- ‘That’s a scandal’: CDC knew COVID shots caused deaths, but lied with public denialsA new report from the Epoch Times reveals its investigation shows that the CDC knew of the links between the COVID shots and death – and lied about them.
- FDA agrees to remove anti-ivermectin posts off the internet in lawsuit settlementThe Food and Drug Administration has reportedly settled a lawsuit brought by three doctors who accused the health regulator of interfering with their ability to practice medicine and prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID.
- No good news about student learning on 4-year anniversary of COVID school closuresFour years ago this month, schools nationwide shut down as COVID-19 numbers skyrocketed and students were sent home for what was initially planned to be two weeks.
- NBA Hall-of-Famer among plaintiffs in lawsuit over WA state COVID-19 restrictionsNBA Hall-of-Famer John Stockton of Spokane is among the plaintiffs suing over alleged free-speech sanctions levied against health care providers who spoke out against state restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Opinion: Gov. Inslee wants to be remembered for COVID-19 response?Elizabeth Hovde of the Washington Policy Center doesn’t think Gov. Jay Inslee should remind people of his legacy COVID response.