State Hospital Association counsel believes the new approach would make Washington State a medical tourism destination
Cole Lauterbach
The Center Square Washington
Washington hospitals want the courts to stop a state mandate that they must give patients from anywhere in the world free non-emergency care.
The Washington State Hospital Association filed a lawsuit in Thurston County Superior Court challenging the state Dept. of Health’s edict saying hospitals must offer non-emergency care to anyone in order to keep their nonprofit status. For decades, the state has allowed hospitals to only offer emergency care to “indigent persons” who need it and restrict non-emergency care to residents of the state or the hospital’s geographic area. DOH changed the requirement in September.
“The new interpretation dramatically departs from more than three decades of established practice based on the state’s current charity care law and now bars hospitals from implementing charity care policies with any geographic limit,” said Taya Briley, executive vice president and general counsel for the hospital association. “Instead, it requires hospitals to provide free or discounted care to anyone from anywhere. The new approach would make Washington State a medical tourism destination.”
Currently, mid-size and larger hospitals give free or discounted care for patients making up to 400% of the federal poverty level, or $58,000 for an individual and $120,000 for a family of four. Smaller hospitals, most often in rural areas, give free or discounted service to those making up to 300% of the federal poverty level, or about $43,000 for an individual and $90,000 for a family of four. Certain exceptions apply to what is considered assets when qualifying patients for free care, such as home value, low-dollar insurance or owned vehicles used for employment.
Association CEO Cassie Sauer said Monday that the influx of newly qualified care seekers would put a strain on the state’s already stretched hospital system and make a visit more expensive for patients who can pay.
“There is no such thing as free care. Nurses, physicians, pharmacists, housekeepers and other staff who care for charity care patients still must be paid,” Sauer said. “Under the department’s interpretation, people living in Washington will subsidize charity care services to people from outside of the state.”
In its September proposal, DOH said a law signed by Gov. Jay Inslee in March 2022 means hospitals “shall not be based, in whole or in part, on an indigent person’s residency.”
The hospitals are seeking a ruling before the change takes effect on Jan. 16, 2024.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Opinion: Revolution or revival?
Nancy Churchill argues that Washington state is ground zero for a Marxist-style revolution but says a cultural revival is possible through personal responsibility and the America First movement. - WA governor pressed to veto $1.8B piece of Democrats’ tax bill
Grocers and restaurateurs are urging Gov. Ferguson to veto a surcharge in HB 2081 that they say will raise food prices statewide. - CCSO makes arrest in attempted kidnapping investigationA 31-year-old Vancouver man has been arrested in connection with an attempted kidnapping involving a teenage girl near NE 149th Street.
- Changing roles: Brian Witherspoon accepts position as head coach of Camas girls basketballBrian Witherspoon has been hired to lead the Camas girls basketball program after serving as interim boys coach last season.
- Vehicle crashes into Vancouver Fire Station 6 during emergency responseA vehicle crashed into Vancouver Fire Station 6 late Tuesday night while crews were out on an emergency call.
- Letter: ‘It’s said sarcasm is the lowest form of wit’Amboy resident Thomas Schenk criticizes Olympia’s use of “emergency clauses” and other legislative tactics that limit public participation.
- Letter: ‘We’re going to give them some money and a plane ticket, and then we’re going to work with them’Camas resident Anna Miller supports a new structured self-deportation policy, calling it a balanced approach to immigration and economic needs.
