
The commission voted to recommend that the Legislature double the number of hours required to qualify for the benefit from 500 to 1,000 hours a year
On Tuesday, the Long-Term Services and Supports (LTSS) Trust Commission held a meeting to vote on several recommended changes to the state’s new long-term care insurance program. Among the most controversial, the commission voted to recommend that the Legislature double the number of hours required to qualify for the benefit from 500 to 1,000 hours a year, a change Rep. Peter Abbarno says would make a bad program worse.
“Doubling the number of hours Washingtonians would have to work just to qualify for an already inadequate benefit is fundamentally unfair,” said Abbarno, Republican, 20th Legislative District. “This change would hurt many part-time and seasonal workers by forcing them to pay into a system they may never benefit from.”
On July 1, most workers in Washington, including part-time and temporary workers, began paying up to $0.58 per $100 of their earnings for the WA Cares Fund. The $36,500 benefit, including access to services and supports, will not be available to qualified, eligible individuals until July 2026.
In 2019, over the unanimous objections of House Republicans, Democrats passed House Bill 1087, establishing the Long-Term Care Services and Supports Program. Later that year, nearly 63% of Washington voters said the Legislature should repeal the payroll tax through Advisory Vote No. 20.
Abbarno listened to the voters and introduced House Bill 1594 (2021) and House Bill 1011 (2022) to repeal the program and payroll tax. Despite the overwhelming public disapproval of the payroll tax, neither bill received a committee hearing.
On April 3, 2023, during floor debate on the House Democrats’ 2023-25 operating budget (Senate Bill 5187), Abbarno offered Amendment 545 that would have repealed the program and payroll tax. House Democrats voted the amendment down.
“At a time when families in Washington are struggling to afford gas, groceries, housing, and childcare – those kitchen table issues that affect most of us – the last thing we need is state government creating more economic uncertainty,” said Abbarno. “This change would make a bad program worse.”
Learn more at: houserepublicans.wa.gov/repeal-ltc
Information provided by Washington State House Republicans
houserepublicans.wa.gov
Also read:
- Rep. John Ley supports C-TRAN Bus Rapid Transit to save Washington moneyRep. John Ley praised C-TRAN’s new BRT line as a faster, lower-cost alternative to light rail, urging support for transit options that save taxpayers money and improve service.
- C-TRAN, WSU Vancouver celebrates groundbreaking for The Vine on Highway 99C-TRAN and WSU Vancouver broke ground on the Vine’s Highway 99 route, a 9-mile bus rapid transit line connecting the university to downtown Vancouver and the Waterfront, set to open in 2027.
- Letter: The Charterist III — Concerning the powers of the Legislative BranchJohn Jay continues his Charterist series, arguing that Clark County’s legislative branch is structurally weak and lacks the resources to balance the executive, calling for reform in the next charter review.
- C-TRAN board again postpones vote on light rail operations and maintenance costsThe C-TRAN board again postponed a vote on language regarding operations and maintenance costs tied to light rail expansion, with pending lawsuits involving Michelle Belkot continuing to impact board actions.
- Opinion: ‘Today’s Democratic Party is not our father’s Democratic Party’Editor Ken Vance reflects on how today’s Democratic Party diverges from the values he associates with his father’s generation, citing issues like taxation, gender policies, and shifting ideology in Washington state politics.
- Opinion: ‘The Interstate Bridge project lacks billions in funding from both Oregon and Washington’Lars Larson criticizes Oregon’s funding decisions, highlighting the billions missing from both states for the Interstate Bridge replacement project and calling it a dead-end effort lacking Coast Guard approval.
- Court rules against Save Vancouver Streets A judge has ruled against Save Vancouver Streets in its legal effort to place a street-use initiative on the ballot. The group is considering whether to appeal.