Sen. Lynda Wilson is concerned the drop-off in income tax revenue may prompt an effort from legislative Democrats to expand the tax
The budget leader for Senate Republicans says a sharp decline in the amount of state capital gains tax being collected is behind the largest negative state revenue forecast since the COVID-19 pandemic.
Sen. Lynda Wilson, R-Vancouver, is concerned the drop-off in income tax revenue may prompt an effort from legislative Democrats to expand the tax.
Wilson chairs the state Economic and Revenue Forecast Council. Today the bipartisan panel of legislative- and executive-branch leaders adopted a second-quarter forecast that shows a $666 million revenue drop through the next two budget cycles: a decline of $477 million for the 2023-25 fiscal biennium and $189 million for the 2025-27 biennium.
The decline shouldn’t knock the current budgets out of balance, Wilson added, as there is ample money in reserve plus three more quarterly forecasts – two more in 2024 and the first of 2025 – to consider. She offered this assessment following the council vote:
“When we adopted the year’s first-quarter forecast in February, the state’s chief economist warned us to expect slow economic growth – but the economy is not to blame for this predicted drop in revenue. The change in this quarter’s forecast goes hand-in-hand with a sharp decline in the state’s capital-gains tax collections.
“In its first year the capital-gains tax took in about $800 million; here in year two the collections are on track to total about half that much. This is exactly the kind of volatility I and others predicted when the majority Democrats adopted the capital-gains tax.
“When a tax fails to bring in the anticipated level of revenue, it’s almost inevitable that someone will want to cast the net wider and capture more money. Our Democratic colleagues already proposed that idea, and we should expect they will do so again.
“The thousands of Washingtonians already subject to the capital-gains tax include people who have spent years building a business, then sell it to retire. Next thing you know, someone will suggest adding home sales to the list of things covered by the capital-gains tax, and that would hit far more people.
“I’ve said it before: The capital-gains tax doesn’t pay for anything that can’t be funded with other revenue. Our schools and other important things like access to childcare never should have been tied to such a volatile tax. Today’s forecast is proof.”
Also read:
- POLL: Should Joe Biden remove himself from the presidential election?
Should Joe Biden remove himself from the presidential election? - Biden defends disastrous debate performance as Democrats panic
President Joe Biden and his campaign are facing the fallout of a disastrous debate performance Thursday night. - WAGOP provides response to the SCOTUS ruling in the Grants Pass CaseWashington State Republican Party Chairman Jim Walsh issued a statement on the U.S. Supreme Court’s City of Grants Pass v. Johnson decision.
- Vancouver Police Department issues statement on sentencing in Sahota murder trialThe Vancouver Police Department issued a statement Thursday on the sentencing of the defendant in the murder of VPD Officer Donald Sahota.
- Letter: ‘Do you want what’s happened to the city of Portland to happen in Clark County?’Washougal resident Mike Johnson discusses the transportation issues residents of Southwest Washington are facing.
- Video: Children rally to Dash for Cash with the RaptorsThe annual Dash for Cash night, courtesy of iQ Credit Union, was a big success as children from Clark County got to sprint on the Ridgefield Raptors baseball field, looking for cash that was scattered throughout the outfield.
- Opinion: When Government permit processes kill small businessMark Harmsworth of the Washington Policy Center shares an example of how government delays and red tape destroy small businesses.
The capital gains tax has been in existance since 2022. That’s extra money the state has to spend. Certainly not the cause of any shortage. For all those in Olympia that are clueless…..the problem is spending!
Ah – but they DO tie it to funding important things. So that they can justify expanding it when the tax revenue decreases. Same with public safety. Their tactics aren’t too difficult to figure out. Just like the federal income tax, which started at 1% – once they get their hooks in, it will do nothing but expand! Remember – a decline in revenue, when the state usually has a surplus and has reserves, just means that the revenue isn’t as much as it was. It doesn’t mean it’s not enough.