Under Washington’s constitution, the people have the right of initiative and referendum, and any registered voter of the state can individually or in conjunction with an organization propose legislation to amend existing law or create a new state law
Carleen Johnson
The Center Square Washington
Washington Democrats on Tuesday passed a bill out of the Senate Government, Tribal Relations and Elections Committee, dubbed by critics to be the “initiative killer.”
SB 5382, sponsored by Sen. Javier Valdez, D-Seattle, who chairs the Government, Tribal Relations and Elections Committee, would require signature gatherers circulating initiative and referendum petitions to sign declarations attesting to the validity of the voter who has signed. It would also require the secretary of state to verify residential addresses when certifying petition signatures.
Under Washington’s constitution, the people have the right of initiative and referendum, and any registered voter of the state can individually or in conjunction with an organization propose legislation to amend existing law or create a new state law. That process, also spelled out in the state constitution, amounts to filing the initiative with the Secretary of State’s Office, gathering signatures to qualify the measure, and then sending it either to lawmakers or directly to the people.
“It is a really sad day,” said Sen. Shelly Short, R-Addy, during Tuesday’s hearing ahead of the bill being passed out of committee. “It’s absolutely chilling what this bill will do to the process.”
Majority Democrats who backed the bill argue using paid signature gatherers opens the process to fraud and those gatherers should be accountable for what is on the petition.
“What could possibly go wrong when you’re paying people to gather signatures?” posed Sen. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, during a Tuesday gathering with reporters in Olympia ahead of the hearing.
Pederson suggested the basic reform of the bill is about voter integrity.
“You would actually match up the signature with the address of a registered vote. Wow, that does not seem like a big leap,” said Pedersen.
Republican leaders have a much different opinion of the bill and also discussed the legislation during the GOP media availability Tuesday morning.
“We refer to this one as the initiative killer, as it will most certainly make it more difficult for the people putting signatures together and make the process less democratic,” said Senate Minority Leader John Braun, R-Centralia. “This is pushing aside the voter because they weren’t happy with the initiatives that were put before them last year.”
Six initiatives qualified to the legislature for the 2024 session, and three of those were adopted by lawmakers. The other three went to the November ballot but were rejected by voters. One additional initiative, I-2066 to retain natural gas as an energy choice, was approved by voters.
Consideration and debate over the measures absorbed a great deal of time and effort in Olympia with many dubbing 2024 “the initiatives session.”
One of the measures approved by lawmakers was I-2081, the Parental Bill of Rights, which majority Democrats have come back this year with plans to dramatically amend.
As reported by The Center Square, hundreds of people rallied at the Capitol last weekend in protest of the bill to gut the initiative (SB 5181), which has already cleared the full Senate.
“It is frustrating that Democrats in the legislature won’t be content until they have all the power to control everything and stifle any dissent,” said Rep. Drew Stokesbary, R-Auburn, during the Tuesday press event. “For as much as they criticize Trump and accuse him of having authoritarian tendencies, what they’re doing sure looks like stifling dissent to me.”
Republicans in the Senate Government, Tribal Relations and Elections Committee offered several amendments, all of which were rejected ahead of final passage.
Sen. Phil Fortunato, R-Federal Way, asked staff to the committee to read from the section of the state constitution that protects the people’s right to the initiative process.
As staff scrambled to pull that up, Fortunato said he could help.
“It simply says you have to be a registered voter. It doesn’t give any kind of qualifications of the gatherer; it doesn’t say you have to sign with your left hand or right hand or blue ink or whatever. It simply says they have to be registered voters,” said Fortunato.
The bill includes the threat of jail time and fines for signature gatherers who commit “false reporting” if it ends up that there is false information from voters who signed the petition.
Sen. Shelly Short, R-Addy, voiced support for an amendment to remove the “false reporting” language from the bill.
“I believe this will induce fear and people will think twice about going out to do the grassroots work of gathering signatures,” said Short. “A state government that in inducing fear into the citizens of Washington state is just not good on any level.”
Just ahead of the vote, Rep. Matt Marshall, R-Eatonville, spoke with The Center Square about SB 5382.
“Democrats like whatever works for them. They don’t like it when it works against them,” said Marshall. “No, this is wrong. This is how the people respond when the government is not doing its job; it’s how people hold government accountable. This is a slap in the face to every voter.”
Brian Heywood, founder of Let’s Go Washington, the group behind last year’s initiatives, emailed a statement to The Center Square upon the bill’s committee passage today.
“By effectively killing the initiative process, the legislature is showing what they really think about 3 million voters engaging in citizen advocacy. This bill is a solution in search of a problem. SB 5382 would create stricter regulations for the initiative process than our voter ID laws. Why are we making a double standard? This bill is politically motivated to solidify the power of the majority and silence anyone who questions their authority,” wrote Heywood.
This report was first published by The Center Square Washington.
Also read:
- Opinion: An unacceptable tax burden
Nancy Churchill outlines new tax proposals in Washington state, warning of growing burdens on working families amid budget shortfalls and government overspending. - POLL: Is it time for new leadership at Vancouver City Hall?A new weekly poll asks whether Vancouver voters should prioritize replacing the mayor and city council in the 2025 election.
- Opinion: How will the majority party’s new budget and tax proposals affect you?Rep. John Ley critiques the state’s proposed 2025-27 budgets, warning of record-breaking tax hikes and economic impacts.
- 18th District lawmakers ensure vital funding for projects in SW Washington are included in proposed 2025-27 House capital budgetLawmakers in the 18th District secured over $5.6 million in proposed funding for projects in Vancouver and Battle Ground under the 2025-27 House capital budget.
- Bill amending parents’ rights initiative passes another hurdle in the WA HouseESSB 5181, a bill modifying Washington’s parents’ rights initiative, advances amid sharp debate over student autonomy and parental access to information.
I spent most of my life in California. The right to submit petitions, referendums, and propositions to the electorate was a valuable right of the electorate. The famous Proposition 13 (which in various forms was passed in other states, including WA), was essential to the economic growth of California. It took nearly 20 years for the leftist state legislature to (mostly) wipe out the positive effects of Prop 13 (and get taxes going ever higher.) Indeed, we moved from California to Washington a dozen years ago in large part to remove ourselves from the ever-increasing taxes in California. Sadly, Washington has been infected with the same taxation disease as California.
The recent petition to eliminate the “capital gains tax” in Washington is a case in point. The state wrote the description of the ballot measure in such obscure terms that I suspect that a large number of people who supported the idea of blocking this new tax (which will negatively affect many elderly, retirees) may have unintentionally voted the “wrong” way since the wording on the ballot was most confusing. (I had to read it several times to figure out what a yes or no vote actually meant.)
What the Washington government needs is a “Musk-like” Department of Government Efficiency to review its operations. I have no doubt that there is much wasteful spending, fraud, and abuse in our government.
Obviously, the subject proposed legislation is to keep the voters from interfering with the politician’s desire to spend and spend and spend our tax dollars.
Senate Bill 5382 must be stopped. Democrats do not like citizen actions in the form of initiatives and referendums. Our nation back in September 5, 1774 established the Continental Congress on citizen input. To this day our government is a Representative Republic (not a democracy) made up of elected representatives and senators who are supposed to listen to “we the people”. When a proposal from either chamber finds fault, then something is wrong and needs more “we the people” input. We do support election integrity (EIT) teams across our state. But we oppose any form resistance from our elected officials that stifle public input like initiatives and referendums. SB5382 must die.